Unsafe pallet unsafe pallet unsafe

Don't drop it instantly then. Try to actually learn to play for stuns and chain pallets instead of running to your yellow aura'd Windows of Opportunity pallets and throw them with no counterplay

The problem I think is they have brought in wayyyy too many antiloop Killers. They have to finish their Killer adjustments, get everyone to a decent spot, and then they'll have to reverse course a bit.

Some maps are much too small, some still have too many pallets and vaults while others have hardly any. Some Killers have too much in their kit and some still do not have enough. There's maybe two M1 chase style Killers up in A tier, the rest, notice, are all multikit or M2.

The game is still much too competitively minded and the way emblems and MMR is, reflect that - everyone has adapted too much to being used to hardcore sweat tactics and playing super seriously, and there's no recourse there. And yes, some of it is in fact people not wanting to learn the concepts of the game as much, and some of it IS in fact entitlement, both sides.

The pursuit of trying to fix problems for both sides, especially Survivor side, has created more issues. Instead of just buffing Killers that really do need it up to the level of others while also buffing some perks for Survivor, there's been a lot of nerfs for both sides that don't feel adequate. These changes SHOULD have been done so much sooner, but now that they're making up for lost time doing it all en masse it feels to some Survivors like they are being unfairly targeted and Killers get everything (untrue) while it ALSO feels to Killers like Survivors have become bigger and bigger and bigger babies about everything (also not true).

I feel like people often use SWF as a crutch in arguments. When they nerfed healing, they aimed to structure the gameplay towards teamwork. Do you want other examples? You either have teamwork perks or solo perks. The idea that behavior could detect and nerf SWF is absurd. Imagine people sitting in the same room? How would you detect that? Not everyone uses Discord. And if they found ways to nerf Discord users, people would just switch to a different platform.

"It’s wild how many people on these forums don’t see how bad the survivor experience has become."

Or it's just a case we have different experiences. I do think there are some changes in order for the survivor side to make it a little more of a pleasant experience but I just don't experience the constant miserable experiences some people are claiming. Maybe I have a higher tolerance, maybe I'm lucky, maybe it's because I don't play to burn out like some around her. I don't know. It's just not my experience.

I don't think it's entitlement (for the most part) or some conspiracy either but I think there are a number of players that want an extremely casual experience. They just want to play on autopilot and turn their brain off. Not that I'm advocating for comp levels of sweat but I do worry that the devs seem to be leaning into this "Autopilot style" of gameplay and and that would make a boring game.

Or you should just be better and stop throwing away every pallet you see
not all pallets need to be brain dead god pallets

could you show some examples so we know which ones you mean

Lots of survivors perks became trash so about 90% of them and what is sad is that killers has a perk variant to counter survivor version example hate boil over? Agitation or iron grasp is there.

Hate healing or boons? Nurses and shatter hope, I can go on but ill just use those examples and killers get mad and say I should not run x this to counter x this or that or its too weak.

Ub is ONE time use that is what makes it useless and aint no unbreakable one time use is gonna save you from some killers like twins the slug siblings. I dont even know what's is the point on talking about it has not been nerf, why would it need a nerf for its one time use and slow 35% recovery speed?

Count all survivor perks and then actually take the time and think about whether or not they are bad. Both sides have more bad perks than good perks but overall it's not like only 10% of survivor perks are good. Just from the top of my head: SB, Lithe, Wicked, Alert, Bond, Deliverance, WoO, Resilience, Deja Vu, Open Handed (incredibly underrated), Iron Will, Adrenaline, Unbreakable, Babysitter, Kindred, Shadow Step (though this one can be better or worse depending on the map), DS, OTR, We'll Make It, Hope, Quick and Quiet, Lightweight, Distortion and Vigil.

I have no idea what you're even trying to say with perk counters here. Most perks can be countered and that's perfectly fine. Boil Over also hasn't been a very good perk in a long time. It was nerfed, which was 100% necessary and then it was left untouched. Not to mention that it was never a healthy perk to begin with. The best use you could get out of it was by abusing hook dead zones, which made you virtually unhookable and left the killer with no option other than bleed you out. What great design. Almost as great as Knockout.

Bringing Nurse into this argument is the most picture perfect example of a strawman. Because Nurse, the strongest killer in the game by a long shot, exists and can theoretically counter some perks, they are weak. That's like saying that all killer perks are bad because comp SWFs can easily deal with them. And about Shattered Hope… This perk wasn't even used back when boons were still at their peak. Because there is no way for you to know whether or not the survivors will use a boon and even then, you don't counter it. You just lessen the blow. The boon can be set up and used, you need to find and kick the totem, which means that you have to waste time that you should spend in chase and then it can still be used on another totem, so you have to repeat the whole process again.

Again, Unbreakable wasn't nerfed at all since its time in the meta. Are you going to tell me that survivors had worse perks back then? That doesn't really work with your argument that survivor perks all get nerfed. It doesn't need a nerf but it's still just as strong as back when you used to see it pretty much every match on at least 1 or 2 survivors. Also, maybe you should read up on what Unbreakable actually does. You don't recover at 35% speed but at 135% speed. That is a massive difference.

Also, without my swf I wouldn't spend much of my time on DBD, probably. Because solo que is just terrible experience.

I am playing swf and we still escape maybe 40% of the time.

We all have more than 3k hours each, one guy has 10k, I have 9k. But here is the thing, we all work full-time jobs and we just want to have decent, chill experience in a game.

BUT lately I am playing more solo que, because I have maybe 1-2 hours daily for gaming, but that's when my friends are sleeping. I am telling you, it's terrible experience and 40-50% of my games are against blights, nurses and billys. Losing everything because it's too hard if other people can't give decent chases. Also I am being ignored if I give one decent chase or killer checks out my hours.

Also survivior waiting queue when I am playing are like 3-5 minutes. Waiting so much for miserable match doesn't make me happy.

Within last months I literally went from 60 hours weekly gaming to like 20-40

Game is unbearable without friends.

God pallets suck because you can't even loop them.

You should ask a question to clarify things before you jump at someone xenorton says ub is 135% recovery speed when I said its only 35% and tells me I should look it up in which I was correct on my previous statement. It nothing about the perk being strong or weak

Umm it says increased by 35%... meaning 135% recovery speed right?

why would it need a nerf for its one time use and slow 35% recovery speed?

You don't. I mean, come on. This is 5th grade math. You recover at 100% speed normally. With Unbreakable, your recovery speed is INCREASED by 35%. That means you recover at 100% + 35% = 135% the normal speed. That's not slow, that's fast. It translates to 26% less time spent recovering.

We're just pointing out basic things about unbreakable which later admit to being in error of.