http://dbd.game/killswitch
survivor bashing content
Comments
-
On of these is playing the game in a scummy way
The other is abbandoning 4 other players in a "lost" game
0 -
You were comparing a killer tunneling to survivors DC'ing in terms of accepted behavior. That's not the same. Nobody said anything about killers DC'ing. Bots are usually dead weight regardless, everyone would rather have a living player over a bot.
And if the killer DCs, the survivors win and the killer loses. If a survivor DCs, it doesn't just affect them, it affects the team that was left behind and instantly puts them in a losing position.1 -
Where have you been? This has been something on-going for years. It's why the DC penalties rolled out 10 months ago, so aggressively at first that Survivors were getting matchmaking bans for playing normally. People advocate for them to be stronger all of the time.
You're correct that it happens on both sides, but you and I are specifically talking about the moral argument which always falls on Survivor.
3 -
Translation: It's allowed for Killer so it's OK, but Survivor needs to be punished.
The Survivors do not win. It's a tie every time. The results are discarded. And like I said, what if those Survivors wanted to play?What if they had challenges? What if they had adepts? None of that matters apparently.
0 -
Translation: It's allowed for Killer so it's OK, but Survivor needs to be punished.
They're being punished because they abandoned their team, not because they played in a certain way. No game should ever allow a player to just abandon the team who wanted to play because they felt like it.
The Survivors do not win. It's a tie every time. The results are discarded. And like I said, what if those Survivors wanted to play?What if they had challenges? What if they had adepts? None of that matters apparently.
Everything you just said is much worse if a survivor ally decided to DC. Going for a adept, challenge or just wanted to play the game? You're now stuck with a bot with no game sense that will likely die very soon. If a killer left and instead survivors were left with a mindless bot, forcing them to play through the trial with a non-player, then I'd understand the perspective, but the game ends right there and you get to queue up soon after.
Its not that its accepted behavior, its that no one cares. Its such a non-issue that ends so quickly that most people don't mind if killer leaves because they just get to queue with another killer soon after. And for whatever reason, you're trying to point out that a killer DC'ing and ending the game is the same as survivor DC'ing, leaving their team behind mid match because they felt the game was over for them.
The only time this comparison is applicable is in 2v8, where if a killer abandons their teammate after waiting a long queue.2 -
You’re talking about the inactivity warnings/bans which are not the same thing as DC bans. I agree with you that it was stupid how survivors were getting punished for playing normally with the inactivity bans.
I’m talking about DC bans for leaving the game early. I do think those should be stronger (for both sides) because I still see people doing it all the time and ruining the match for everyone. I still haven’t seen anyone arguing that it’s OK for killers to DC from a match. If you find someone trying to argue this, let me know.
1 -
It's true that these contents are cheap clicklbaiting slop, but you see that criticism is more frequently on "survivors being toxic" rather than a specific play style (like survivors do by criticizing slugging, tunneling and etc) is because playing Killer can be almost aguarbly far more frustrant than playing survivor, and that's usually by design.
Losing your hook because of a flashlight save or a sabo, specially if you feel that it was hard earned, will always be very frustranting even if the survivors weren't toxic per se, as well as having a bad killer match will always be longer than a bad survivor game unless if the survivors hang on to taunt you or whatever before triggering EGC
So all in all, Killer mains tends to hold more grugdes
-3 -
It's more than just what could happen in-game. It's the fact that survivors who get upset at the slightest convenience (failing a save, gets downed fast early in the match, hears a certain killers tr, etc.) take things out of the game and will personally insult other players for stuff that happens in game. And this is what survivor mains don't understand. This is only a few of many messages I would get as killer just because I maybe tunneled once or twice in a match or slugged a bit because someone was around for a save. The last time I got a message like this from a killer was MONTHS ago but I'm guaranteed to get these kind of messages at least once a play session. Think about that.
-2 -
If a killer DCs it's because they can't handle the pressure. Funny enough, same for survivors!
The matter of players DCing should not be partisan and anybody trying to excuse it should be called out.
5 -
Gather clips and make it.
0 -
So, if survivors win it's because the game is catered to them. If they lose, it's just because majority of them don't know how to play. Does killer skill factor in at all? CCs have turned this community's brains to mush
5 -
I saw that first vid and am genuinely convinced that Mint is either rage-baiting or has massive skill issues. Killer has never been easier and DCs aren't that big of a problem.
2 -
Yes, but this is not the reality. You see people saying that Killer DCs are more justified. I dont see people complaining that Killers are so entitled when they DC either.
And well, we always see that people complain about Survivor toxicity. Yet, when someone complains about Killer toxicity, some people start to say that this Killer was probably bullied in a previous match and is letting off some steam.
So while you are correct, the perception of this community is a bit different.
1 -
You don't see it because it's not that prevalent. On the other hand, survivors DCing is common enough to draw the attention of both sides. It's a matter of scale, not your side does it too so there's no real issue.
No, killers are not justified in DCing. Will you say the same for survivors?
1 -
That's because when people complain about survivors DCing is because they do it when they are the first down, tipically very early in the game, and the ones to complain the most are fellow survivors.
No one gives a sht when they abandon or when the Killer ends the match earlier giving these people the satisfactions of annoying their opponent to this extend and receiving all the XP and BP they earned
-1 -
"So, if survivors win it's because the game is catered to them. If they lose, it's just because majority of them don't know how to play."
Uhh, yeah, that's literally what I said. The majority of survivor players are not outstanding at this game, which is why even the weakest killers like Skull Merchant, Ghostface, or Trapper are still able to hold a fairly decent kill rate. Yet the moment any of these killers who are B-tier or lower go against a team that actually knows what they're doing, they don't stand a chance.
And yes, obviously killer's have to have skill to win. What kind of question is that? If you're not good at a certain killer then you're going to struggle even against below average survivors. The problem is that it doesn't matter how good you are at playing a specific killer, because for the majority of the roster there's really not much you can do against genuinely good survivors who aren't holding back. Only the A-tiers can somewhat hold their own, and basically only Blight and Nurse have a shot at actually winning.
And by the way, my brain is not "mush" because you reside in an echo chamber and I have a different opinion than you. Smh, grow up
-1
