Do you think "Surge" is a decent killer perk?
i use it all the time and it always works out for me! i'm just interested in seeing what others have to say. :0
Do you think "Surge" is a decent killer perk? 33 votes
9 votes
6 votes
15 votes
2 votes
1 vote
Comments
-
Yes!
I think it's fine. High mid tier perk.
0 -
Other (leave a comment!)
Interesting idea, but could be better.
The fact that it only triggers on basic attacks takes away some of its usability on non-M1 Killers, I dont see why it doesnt just work on any time a Survivor is downed, like Infectious Fright.
I really dont think it needs the 40 second cooldown either, as the Killer is unlikely to score multiple downs in under a minute unless the Survivors screw up massively.
1 -
It's situational.
It'd actually be really good if it triggered on non-basic attacks as well.
4 -
It's situational.
Pop Goes the Weasel is still better imo.
1 -
It's situational.
This, and pretty much most other anti-gen perks do a better job one way or another.
There are situations that do allow it to excel and be better than the other perks, but these are few and far between.
3 -
Nope.
Only works on basic attacks which is enough for me to not like it or want to use it
0 -
Nope.
Not very good. Needs the cooldown completely removed.
0 -
Yes!
When mixing it with certain perks you can slow the game down greatly, thrilling for example
0 -
Nope.
Ruin isn't comparable.
Use PGTW as your comparison instead.
0 -
It's situational.
I have it in a anti-generator build I run. It's pretty useful in smaller maps like the Hawkins Lab, but the larger maps like the MacMillin Estate or the Cornfield it's not terribly useful.
Using it with Surveillance is great.
0 -
Yes!
Why not both?
0
