Slaphappyhobbit

About

Username
Slaphappyhobbit
Joined
Visits
90
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
22
Badges
5
Posts
47

Comments

  • "Public lobbies." That right there is the issue. Killers shouldn't have to go against a public lobby to be strong and it shouldn't just be "oh well, it was an SWF there was nothing I can do." The game needs to be balanced around SWF and looking at something in a public lobby is not a good gauge of how strong something is.
  • Maybe, just maybe you see a lot of complaints from killers because the game is insanely bad for killers right now and not in the least bit balanced? Just a thought.
  • That's not even mentioning the fact that EMPs can remove the infection from other survivors so if you go against an SWF with even half a brain cell between them you're likely never going to make use of your power because they'll be able to just run to each other and EMP any time someone gets infected or stick together and…
  • The issue with that isn't that distortion is needed, the issue with all balancing in the game right now is literally that SWF exists. If the devs would just admit that SWF screws EVERY other part of the game up completely, and add punishments of some kind for playing as SWF to make it so group play wasn't so strong, they…
  • No, not for 1v1 games. Jesus. That's literally how games need to be balanced. If you balance around making bad players feel the game is fair those players never have a reason to improve and the good players that are playing their role will absolutely destroy anyone they go against. It's mind boggling people can't…
  • You balance around the top end of play because that shows what players are capable of doing, and if that isn't balanced, the game never will be. It's literally one of the easiest things to understand. The fact that you're claiming it's a bad way to balance is mind boggling. It doesn't matter if that's "not how most people…
  • Yeah...punish the killer for a playstyle that survivors can force with builds. That's a bloody brilliant idea.
  • You....you realize that's how game balancing actually works right? You're supposed to balance around top end play, not low end play.
  • It's really sad that that's your attitude. It's a game, you're wrong about this, point blank period. You can sit here and cry "I'm done, you're wrong" all you want but it's literally a game. People are going to play to win, and if there's 4 kills available it's not "wasting someones time" to try and secure those 4 kills.…
  • I'm not compensating for anything lmao. It's astounding that you're this upset over a game. It's literally part of the game, if there's 4 survivors available to kill, killers are going to do what they can to get 4 kills. Should one of the survivors be sacrificed automatically if the gates get opened without a kill? You're…
  • It's literally not. How do you think things like battlegrounds are won in WoW? The vast majority of top tier teams win by literally keeping the enemy team dead the entire match and not letting them do anything. Again, if you don't like it you can just walk away and take a break from the game. You don't get to dictate how…
  • lmao, they most definitely would not get punched in the face. You seem to have some issues going on if you feel that way, and should probably take a break. It's literally a game, people lose time in games all the time. Have you EVER played any other online game in a vs capacity? WoW pvp it's not uncommon to sit a lot while…
  • I think that killers are the biggest part of a chapter. They completely change the game for both survivors and killers as the survivors have to adapt to how each killers plays and what their special ability is. Survivors for the most part, are just skins with different perks. Even though a survivor can add amazing perks to…
  • It's amazing how you're ignoring my suggestion entirely just to keep the argument going and make it look like you're standing on some righteous point here. You're literally denying the killer part of the game play and part of their goal with what you want. Point blank period. That's all there is to this argument. You don't…
  • I don't care about survivors tea bagging at the exit gate? It happens literally every game and doesn't effect anything at all so why care about it? No, that's literally the point, if you suicide as a survivor, the hatch DOES NOT open for the last survivor. That's literally what I said. Oh, is that not fair? Weird that your…
  • Riiiight. Maybe it's time to take a break and walk away from the game then if you've literally lost hours to being slugged? Or, I don't know, run perks to prevent it? How about this, if you're so self righteous, survivors gain the ability to kill themselves if left on the ground, but killers get full BP as though they were…
  • It's absolutely amazing to me that you're being serious about this right now. It's a game. You're literally wasting time just playing it. It's a way to past time. That's the entire point. You're literally sitting here saying killers shouldn't be able to do this because it's wasting someones time....so is hanging someone on…
  • So then don't play the game? You can leave the game if you don't like it, you can run perks to counter it. Killers end up in games all the time where their time is straight up wasted because of SWF teams who bring bully builds or poor match making putting them against 1-2 survivors way above their skill level that bring…
  • Yeah...again, not at all what I'm saying. There. Are. Ways. Around. This. If your entire team ends up getting slugged, you, as survivors, screwed up. Point blank period. They literally can not stop everything that survivors think is un-fun. They've given you perks to help avoid everyone being on the floor at the same time.…
  • When did I say it was a life or death issue? If that's your response, then you should say the same thing about the person who started this post and the survivors crying about something they can literally take a perk to counter. I've gotten plenty of 4ks slugging the second to last person as well. Pointing out something is…
  • "I feel like killers shouldn't be able to get 4ks" OK, summed up what you said for you. Seriously? This reasoning of "I got downed and now it's boring so it shouldn't be allowed" is absolutely insane. Go walk away and take care of something, have something on to watch or available to read while you're playing. The nature…
  • Why do survivors feel they deserve a counter measure for absolutely everything? If you're being slugged that sucks I guess, but what the hell do you expect killers to do if all these requests for counter measures get added to the game? "Devs need to stop slugging. Devs need to stop camping. Devs need to stop tunneling.…
  • Fiend is literally just a word in the English language? Unless there's been some new second meaning or it's a slur in some other language there's nothing wrong with that. As for the other two I have no idea what slurs those would be or even be referencing.
  • You're literally not reading what I'm saying and are making your argument into something completely different than what it was. Unreal. You literally claimed that what people say doesn't matter, the devs have decided it's happening and told someone their opinion and voice on it doesn't matter. I'm telling you that isn't…
  • Ok, I was likely mistaken about that and Mendela effected myself, my bad on that one. The point still stands that the devs have said things and backtracked due to poor testing, feed back etc.
  • Ok....that's exactly my point though? The devs say things, and those things change. This person is claiming that because the devs said it, IT IS HAPPENING. Good lord, reading isn't that difficult.
  • Where in my post did I complain? I literally said that those are things devs never said would come to the game or change and they did.
  • This is an asinine argument. The devs have also said, over and over again, that camping and tunneling are legitimate tactics, and when the game first came out repeatedly said that being able to queue with friends was never intended to be in the game, would be insanely imbalanced and they were not going to add it...guess…
  • So let me get this straight....killers have been having issues for a long time now, where survivors can find an area of a map that doesn't have hooks and abuse that by running to it, and making it so they can't be hooked unless you brought certain perks in. Something that everyone, including survivors, have been asking you…
  • Sounds like you're a little salty for being called out for posting stupid things. You've literally got a post whining that a huge list of addons and killers need to be nerfed so survivors can have a guaranteed escape in end game, you've posted about nerfing a number of killer perks because they're too strong, and can't…
  • You seem to want the killer to be able to do absolutely nothing in this game based on your posts. You are missing a few key points in the posts you're making about wanting so many things nerfed for killers. The point of the game is one killer vs 4 survivors. The survivors are supposed to feel helpless. You aren't supposed…
  • Why does literally every conversation about camping bring this idea up. BHVR tried to pause the meter when the killer was nearby and survivors abused the hell out of it, proving it doesn't working and making it so that the mechanic never made it out of PTB. There's no possible way for this to be done in a fair way.
  • Yep, you're right, I'm dumb. Sorry about that.
  • First it was that kids shouldn't see it, then it's because it's a political issue, then it's that it doesn't fit in the game, then when I explain why it would, it's that the characters wouldn't support it....you really, really need to take a long hard look in the mirror and ask yourself why this bothers you so much that…
  • So your argument is, despite humans being in the game, and the story being that they come from the real world, because killers kill people *and YOU FEEL* that the killers would be against ssm these shouldn't be in the game? Sounds a hell of a lot like you're projecting and looking for issues where there aren't any.
  • How is it unimmersive? The storyline is literally people getting ripped from the real world (or whatever world the character belongs to) into the fog. You don't think some of those characters that get sent into the fog are going to be LGBTQ+?
  • Why does it have to be their sexuality? I'm straight, and I use the pride flag tag on some of my characters because I support the community and feel they need to have equal rights. I've got family members and friends that are part of the community. Doesn't mean I'm LGBTQ+ just because I have that flag on my hook.
  • This right here hits the nail on the head. If SWF is going to exist, the game has to be balanced around it rather than solo queue, or killers need the ability to opt out of playing against SWF groups (which I don't even know is something that's possible to do.) The game was NEVER meant to have communication like voice chat…
  • First....why are you surprised people want to take the easy route? That's kind of what humans do. Would you rather work to be rich or just be born into a rich family if you had the choice? That said, I don't agree with tunneling and try to avoid it when possible, but that's an argument that won't ever really go anywhere it…
  • Does no one remember when they tried to add a mechanic to punish killers who face camped and they had to remove it from the PTR because survivors abused the hell out of it? Insanely short term memories survivors here have.
  • I'm baffled by survivor players trying to defend this. I just had a game against an incredibly toxic SWF team. They all brought flashlights/tool boxes and ran Boil Over. We ended up in the Red Forest. Hooks were far enough apart that I got I think 2 hooks the entire game, despite constantly downing them. Slugging them? Not…
Default Avatar