Best Of

Most people have formulated their reasons at least a dozen times, since this topic is an evergreen here and crops up two to three times a month. Everything's been said about it already. People who come barging in, stomping their foot down and claiming their conclusion are just fishing for validation, and if they can't get that, endless arguments that go nowhere.

Someone says tunnelling is needed, someone else says it's not, people do wonky math, there's a whole lot of 'If you hold [opinion] you're clearly low mmr', people bicker over killrates/winrates, 'that's not what average means', patch notes get dredged up, 'you're just a surv main', 'valid tactic', 'it's anti-FACEcamp', 'but whatabout second chance perks', etc. etc. etc.

Nothing that's said here ever makes a difference. Most we can do is click the little button that tells BHVR someone disagrees. Everything else they either already know, or if they haven't figured it out yet, they never will.

Not everyone is selfish.

Not everyone gains happiness solely from winning.

You do not have to tunnel to win.

It's not just that the wording is inaccurate, it's the classic "I'm the real victim because I have to tunnel 😢😢😢" implication. Meanwhile, you're making four other people unhappy with your choice. And that's what it is, it's 100% a choice. It's offensive to do something that is known to be disliked and then act like your hands were tied.

If It's 4 charges but they're now totally see-through on all maps instead of most, I'll still pass. But if they're actually mostly opaque I might shake up my build and methods.

3 survivors alive will always be better than 4 survivors alive.

Yes, this is true.

Killers have no choice but to tunnel 1 survivor out of the game.

This is an opinion and not a stated fact. Nothing forces a killer to tunnel a survivor and there are many matches won by 4k without tunneling.

so basically no one's going to be playing him on controller still, got it.