Best Of

I would have to think if he was a weapon switcher just weapons spawns around the map would they be infinite or one time use if like the bow was one time use would it respawn over time or no

As Scott says, he doesn't think Jason would be good in DbD because of the little research he did, he doesn't think they can do anything interesting for a power kit for him. As he also mentioned that if they do make a interesting power kit for Jason, he'd be fine with it, but this could possibly be a Krasue situation.

On release Krasue was played often because she was strong, she could end chases pretty quick. Shortly after BHVR made some changes like slowing down her Head form vault speed as well as her infection status was fully cleansed on hooking. This made her slightly weaker and less easy to garner success from her power kit which led to people dropping her. Her power kit isn't really interesting as I see it as a more mobile Nemesis whip with more cures to the infection.

Then wouldn't it stand to reason that people would WANT the iconic slasher guy? Especially to join the roster with OTHER iconic slasher guys?

Midwhich i think proves this, but he still has use around pallets no matter what map. i do agree though

"Everything I disagree with is ragebait."

look, getting left on hook/cage feels like ######### BUT if we introduce this mechanic to self-unhook/cage if no one comes to save will literally have no one going for saves because they can just save themselves. Why go unhook when they will do it themselves and I can just stay on a gen. We are in a time where the community demands buffs to completely amend survivor mistakes. If survivor mistakes are not punished, there's no learning, no improvement or growth.

Jasons story in general, as its pretty relatable for a killer: being at summercamp and getting bullied for his appearance. Then also adding and a tragical isnt something that other slashers at the time tried? Also the whole Dynamic with the mother. While Texas Chainsaw May have leaned into similar grounds Friday 13ths was imo more realistic and actual relatable, understandable. Wasnt it also way more creative with its deaths? Not sure if thats just something that developed with the many sequels but compared to Myers or Leatherface Jason is known to use the Environment or different weapons way more.

As for popularity, it must have something that did spark and held the interests despite it’s ‘poor quality’. And pretty sure its success helped the Horror/slasher genre in general.

As i said, i am not an actual fan, but Jason remains iconic and has notable differences to other slashers of his time.

I am not talking about the x-th sequel btw, and milking of the Franchise, of course the quality went down and probably got staler

I find him super satisfying, more than any other killer iI've played. The dopamine hit I get when a prediction shot through an obstacle hits is unbeatable. It's interesting what mixed feelings people have in regards to playing him.

Actually I thought the Sherlock thing was for fun.

Now while that LAST post was posted post hangover, it's not incorrect. Also have absolutely no idea what you mean by "making a whole article on fraction on the whole discussion above". I'm not talking fractions, neither the mathematical nor group kinds.

You've never proved the statements wrong. Let's break down the last post.

Your standarts, getting nerf arent we. Theres sometimes reason why killer is near hook and bt back then was used because meta was camping thing you missed after years of games development.

Whether or not camping was meta, whether or not there are reasons, THE KILLER WAS BY THE HOOK. That's my point. If they WEREN'T by the hook that's arguing against me, but you didn't say that. You've just basically keep saying "There's reasons the killer was by the hook". If you keep saying I'm wrong by being right it doesn't help any other point and is jarring. Also:

Your standarts, getting nerf arent we.

What?... like a genuine flat what? Censored words confusion?… Hu?

Now moving on from....that mess of random:

Again I hope your nervs arent done, that "watson" somehow got into your head deep.

You again just sound like your saying I'm wrong...yet you've only proved me right while thinking your doing the opposite. None of the past posts or this one has done anything but reinforced my point and confuse me with your tone.

People complain even when they shouldnt or there isnt anything that is to be complained about, just what you do against basement trapper?

So Watson I got a question. Did people complain about being left on the hook? Another question Watson. Does it matter whether or not you think they should or shouldn't have been complaining about that whole mess?

Spoilers: the answers are YES and NO respectively.

The "argument" of complaining when they "should" (and I question your thoughts of "should") doesn't really affect the fact that THEY DID which is my point.

Something you exceed here well mr google.

YOU were the one accusing ME of gaslighting remember? If YOU don't want to be proven wrong don't go falsely accusing ppl.

Like they do now nothing new sherlock.

Want to know what they DIDN'T have back then? Basekit BT. So what would happen if they unhook when killer was near for any reason? The unhooked would be a slug in record time unless the unhooker ran BT...hu…kinda like we've been saying right Watson? Weird ain't it.

When camping and facecamping was meta its obvious but if you need to write it more to finally understand it well good for you.

Which again reenforces me while you keep acting like it's not.

And thats something new here? People complain even when you do something right and it was best counter and it is even today to some situations, sherlock.

It's not new but its what happened isn't it? If my point is that people did complain about this saying it isn't new isn't arguing against me.

So AGAIN, the whole point of this Watson?

On Pyramid Head? how interesting…