Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.
Access the survey HERE!
Ummm what changed? Why is the....
Comments
-
People always say this but in in my experience this is simply not true
As long as you're not relying on a pink addon the bloodpoints you earn in a match usually are enough to fuel your addon expenses
Especially if you play survivor as wel and earn bloodpoints that way
1 -
Every talking about true I listened to what he had to say and he had pretty valid argument 140% move speed with average add ons and he wasn't running nemesis and pwyf either if he was doing that he woulda been even faster.
0 -
Wraith is not top tier.
Some streamer is not able to tell when he killed potatoes.
0 -
Yeah...no.
It's objective that some killers are better than others. Or are you gonna try to convince everyone that legion is just as good as spirit? Or nurse?
You can do well with any killer, but that doesn't mean they are equal.
I'm pretty sure everyone is able to tell when they face a potato.
1 -
i didn't say that that made him less viable lol i was saying that you said perks are irrelevant but he used perks to use as a crutch. Also perks don't mean the killer is viable it means a killer is viable. It means a build is viable.
0 -
I'm sorry but using perks as a "crutch" is no such thing in my eyes
If you don't use everything you have available you're only handicapping yourself for no reason, wich completly defeats the point of trying to see how strong a character is
Why wouldn't you use the perks that work best with the strategy you're going for?
0 -
again perks doesn't mean a killer is viable it just means a build on killer is viable there is a difference
0 -
Nah, tru3 goes against the most optimal teams all the time. At least this is what he is saying when the first Gen pops and the Survivor did already a dozen mistakes.
Dont forget, if a Killer loses, the Survivors are too strong.
If he gets a 4K, its only Skill.
3 -
ngl I was playing wraith with All-Seeing blood and coxcombed and I got a ps message saying that survivor had to get some new pants due to all the gen grabs I did. His friend also said the first guy screams really loud over the mic.
0 -
Well again, i disagree
I can't see the difference
How would a killer be viable then in your eyes? If he can do everything perkless?
0 -
So, in order to have a tiny bit of fun in a game I need to dump all my resources on a specific character, when I have other characters that I wish to play and need perks and/or add-ons on. K.
Hag is a bad example towards your point because she is good without them.
2 -
Not at all,and you don't always need the best of the best addons
All i'm saying is that, for me, addons have never been a rarity with the exeption of pink ones
And i just level the characters as normal
0 -
I don't believe there's such thing as "creating" free thinkers. I certainly don't believe Tru3 is the one who can prove me wrong. I also think I wasted too much time typing this, but eh, I was eating some nachos anyway.
yeah :P
Tru3 is a very competent player, he knows virtually everything of a game that is a party game at heart, but he treats it like if it isn't, and that's why he becomes so frustrated when he loses. He becomes delusional on snipers / this is not my build / I shouldn't have listened to chat that said hatch was there, it's your fault! and what not.
Yes he can be interesting to watch for a newcomer, but eventually one realises that his delusions don't help the community in any way, not as a whole, not as a single.
I suggest everyone to switch to Otzdarva, much more insightful and respectful, modest and probably even more skilled as a killer.
Post edited by Nobsyde on3 -
viable to me means that killer an preform with any decent build not just one also yes if they could do everything without perks that would be viable since they would be op
0 -
Aah ok now i understand it a bit better
And i can see what you mean
Still i think the wraith can still perform well even if you change the build up
Thana for one could definitivly be traded out for something else i feel
0 -
Or you know, watch both
That's also an option : P
0 -
There’s only so many hours in a single day :)
0 -
I watch Otz even as a survivor main. He treats this game like it's supposed to be treated: a fun game with real people playing all sides.
0 -
But aren't you constantly recyling bloodpoints? Spend some, play a match, earn more, spend more?
0 -
Tru3 said that about GF at first, but didn't know how to use him. Once he learned to ditch stalking and run the right build, he found out GF is a top 5 killer. Wraith on the other hand, I think he's just trolling people for turds and giggles. Tru3 is a very good player and 4k's w legion and clown on red ranks sooo....
0 -
They don't like him because there not as good as him and jealous of what he does and his popularity. Probly got their arse kicked by him a few times too, I'd guess.
0 -
i cant stand tru3 lol
0 -
I mean, he is trying to play Wraith very similarly to how he places Ghostface, so I don't necessarily believe that he is being insincere with his claims regarding Wraith.
0 -
🤣🤣👌😆
0 -
Wraith is easily the best Killer in the game. His difficulty should be labeled as Super Easy cause there's nothing Intermediate about him.
0 -
Like I understood it, tru3 didnt want to show that wraith is viable. He wanted to show WHAT makes a killer viable. So having no terror radius, get the first hit easy and catch survs off guard just like ghostface makes a killer strong, instead of alarming survs with a terror radius and following them into loops.
keep in mind that tru3 is not a wraith main and he couldnt perform with other killers so consistently 4ks.
0
