We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

Do you consider ECG hook camping to be toxic?

Gates are open and one survivor hooked, rest of team fully healed.

A lot of killers don't consider it camping and to them camping is staying on hooked survivor on their first hook until they die during early game.

thoughts?

Comments

  • Nickeleye
    Nickeleye Member Posts: 278

    No....Its a necessity unfortunately in your scenario. The only play at that time is to try and use their altruism against them. Hopefully turn that camp into a 2K . That's what I would do anyway.

  • SnakeSound222
    SnakeSound222 Member Posts: 4,467

    No. What else are you supposed to do? Go watch the Survivors tbag at the gate?

  • LordCyphre
    LordCyphre Member Posts: 195

    What else is a killer supposed to do?

  • Boss
    Boss Member Posts: 13,616

    No.

  • OMagic_ManO
    OMagic_ManO Member Posts: 3,278

    What do you want me to do? Let the Survivor get to the gate and t-bag me after nicely letting them leave? God forbid I do something a Survivor doesn't like.

  • EvilJoshy
    EvilJoshy Member Posts: 5,295

    If you don't have a means of downing another survivor than no it is not toxic. If it was a killer with a chainsaw I would call it toxic because they have a way to down another survivor. If you were old nurse I would also call it toxic cause you could catch them before they get to the exit if you were good. Now, with the cd for blinks, I'm not so sure.

  • Entity_Lich94
    Entity_Lich94 Member Posts: 320

    No. As much as it can suck if you're the one on the hook, there is literally no reason for the killer to leave

  • Clevite
    Clevite Member Posts: 4,335

    No. Sux for the survivor but at the point it may be the difference between the killer getting a safety pip or not. Plus a well organized team can still get him out if it is not an insta down killer.

  • OrangeJack
    OrangeJack Member Posts: 464

    Only making this post because I've seen many survivors complain about it both as killer and me being a survivor on the same team as them. Just wanted to see if it is actually considered toxic/nooby by the game's community.

  • Peanits
    Peanits Dev Posts: 7,555

    Nope. If they don't, someone can easily unhook them and run right out the gates, taking a hit a long the way just to be safe. I would never expect someone to give up a kill like that.

  • Aneurysm
    Aneurysm Member Posts: 5,270

    Nothing wrong with camping/tunnelling in endgame imo, it's not like there are gens left to worry about. Sensible survivors usually understand this, others will see no meaningful difference between that and proxy camping followed by green mori with 5 gens left.

  • csandman1977
    csandman1977 Member Posts: 2,358

    To be fair, i dont consider camping toxic at anypoint really. Unfun? Yes. But with the amount of times survivors throw themselves at the killer to get the unhook, sometimes camping is just a great strategy

  • OMagic_ManO
    OMagic_ManO Member Posts: 3,278

    I see it too, I'm not just gonna let someone escape, that's #########.

  • Waffleyumboy
    Waffleyumboy Member Posts: 7,318

    No.

  • Carlosylu
    Carlosylu Member Posts: 2,948

    Not at all, it's just a last try for a kill, totally understandable

  • TAG
    TAG Member Posts: 12,871

    My favorite post-game comments are from a Survivor who died during endgame to camping saying "You shouldn't camp during the endgame because then you don't improve as a player." Yep, you're totally being sincere and not just poorly trying to cover up being salty. Somehow, they never seem to have a good answer to "What should I have done instead?"

  • NullEXE
    NullEXE Member Posts: 1,632

    No? I welcome the challenge 😈

  • OmegaXII
    OmegaXII Member Posts: 2,220

    Does anyone here noticed the op wrote "ECG" instead of "EGC"? :)

  • Carpemortum
    Carpemortum Member Posts: 4,506

    Able to down a survivor and guarantee is another thing. If you go chainsaw sprinting at one, and another unhooks, and you miss, camping would have been a better move.

  • Dr_Loomis
    Dr_Loomis Member Posts: 3,703

    No.

    And it's also a challenge (2 x sacrifice in egc) in the new Tome part.

  • dannyfrog87
    dannyfrog87 Member Posts: 568

    the gates are open, what else do you do? you secure the one kill you got .... im sure you know this why would the killer leave. nothing toxic about it. honestly lol

  • FrankSRfromIT
    FrankSRfromIT Member Posts: 59

    Just so I didn't come across as toxic, I have been leaving the hooked survivor and go chase other survivors at the exit, of course I get no one and all 4 escape (I am not very good, haha). I may need to start camping during end game, because you are right, there is nothing else to do but watch them leave.

  • Mringasa
    Mringasa Member Posts: 980

    There is no reason for the Killer to leave the hooked person, so I don't consider it toxic. I don't do it myself, but that's a personal choice. If there were some other reason for them to move away from the hook, another downed Survivor or NOED is active and they feel they can manage another down, then sure, it'd be pretty trash, but when it's EGC time Survivors need to get out the gate ASAP unless they feel they can make the rescure knowing the Killer will most likely be there too.

  • edgarpoop
    edgarpoop Member Posts: 8,445

    Not toxic. Where is the killer supposed to go and what are they supposed to do?

  • EmpireWinner
    EmpireWinner Member Posts: 1,054

    No

  • feffrey
    feffrey Member Posts: 886

    Wait what? A Dev encouraging camping?

    At that point if you did nothing all game and finally got a hook on End game like stated.

    You deserve to lose if you chased someone then you'll get more kills

    Plus they'll just rush hook with BT and DS so just accept the loss


    It is extremely wrong to camp

  • fleshbox
    fleshbox Member Posts: 494

    Just hope as killer that you manage to place them on a hook far enough from the exit gates as that will be the only deterrence. If it is right next to gates. Forget it. It will be almost impossible to camp.

  • ClickyClicky
    ClickyClicky Member Posts: 3,536

    No, the only reason the other survivors are still in the game is for the unhook. Where else is the killer meant to go? There are no gens to patrol.