We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

The Trickster and The Hag are perfect candidates to test 4.5 Killers

Orthane
Orthane Member Posts: 436
edited December 2023 in Feedback and Suggestions

Trickster in particular is the perfect example of 4.4 being too slow, but 4.6 being too fast. He's insanely oppressive now and it mostly has to do with his Movespeed, but if you simply revert it to 4.4 he goes back to being too easy to loop and way too susceptible to certain areas just being way too strong against him so 4.5 is the middle ground, we should try it. The Hag is an interesting case because ensuring that she can't place traps within 16 meters of a hooked Survivor and simply erasing the existing ones within that range like Skull Merchant's Drones she should honestly be a 4.6 killer, makes 0 sense how someone as OP and high mobility as Blight gets to keep 4.6 but not Hag because she can teleport. Blight can zoom across the map in seconds but oh having to go place a trap and then be able to teleport to it is too much for 4.6 apparently. But I digress. 4.5 feels like the perfect solution to Trickster's movespeed issue and Hag should either have her traps nerfed so they can't be around hooked survivors as mentioned before and be 4.6 or kept as is, but put to 4.5.

Comments

  • Astel
    Astel Member Posts: 661
    edited December 2023

    I always wondered why 4.5m/s doesn't exist.

    Maybe 112.5% calls some kinds of problems for coding due to be decimal number percentage?

    Post edited by Astel on