Insta downs do not make you "good", killers.
Comments
-
Dude... im at like a 90% kill rate, and only because Im too lazy to slug for the 4k. The 10% is survivors who escaped via hatch.
Regarding your no pip while 4k comment though... I saved this beauty to get a giggle every now and then. This was a game that was over in under 2 minutes with no gens done and a 4k. As you can see by the chaser score, no camping. Got this right before the rework.
0 -
Neither does SWF making a good survivor, but you still see 4 man groups teabagging and shaming the killer.
2 -
That is pretty crazy lol but you’re just one person, Unless the devs confirm he has an insane kill rate I’ll hold my opinion of him being balanced.
0 -
i edited that comment real quick...
0 -
For all the killer mains arguing for their instadowns, don't complain about Mettle Of Man, Borrowed Time and Dead Hard. You wanna cheese out health states all day but cry until survibor perks gets nerfed cause you can't learn to counter play. Hypocrite babies.
2 -
You realize that the ppl youre talking about are also the ones who commented on the same dead hard thread you did, saying DH was fine...
2 -
What's the difference? I'm making the same point.
0 -
You just called abunch of ppl "hypocrite babies" who have no problem with your survivor perks...
3 -
lmao holy ######### bro
0 -
you would!
0 -
I clearly said "for a the killer mains arguing for their instadowns". That means the ones that believe their instadowns are fine yet do cry about the perks I listed because they give health states. That's the definition of a hypocrite. Understand me now?
0 -
Which is no one here...
3 -
Well you must be reading a different thread, buddy. I'm agreeing with OP and this is a discussion thread. Unless everyone here is also agreeing with OP (which they're not) you're wrong.
0 -
No one here claimed that those survivor perks were a problem. The handful of ppl who joked about instadowns on THIS thread actually DEFENDED deadhard on the other thread that you yourself posted on. There isnt a single person who defended instadowns on THIS thread that DIDNT also defend dead hard.
2 -
Also, you know, the OP even said on the first page that this thread isn't about whether instant down abilities are okay or not. He made it clear that his objection was to killers thinking they're hot ######### just because they use them.
His exact words: "Again youre not understanding, i dont care about insta downs. Just don't act like youre a god because of it."
0 -
Ppl were definitely being sarcastic, but my comment stands. Litterally not 1 person who commented on this thread saying instadowns are ok, or posted sarcastically about instadowns...didnt ALSO post on the other thread defending the use of deadhard. Of the 3 pages...not 1 person.
1 -
That's right, it's a tool to speed things up.
0 -
I'm literally quoting the ppl arguing againt it in the other thread so how has no one made the argument? Again are you slow or illiterate?
You've been all triggered, arguing with ppl in this thread since page one so idk why youre acting like everyone is in agreement here. By all means, keep trying. You talk yourself into a fallacy with every comment.
0 -
Which person talking in this thread are you even referring to? You havent quoted a single person in this thread other than me, lol.
1 -
Usually people at least wait until the game starts before getting this sweaty, damn.
2 -
Wait, you said not one in the other thread, despite the fact that I quotes them. You won't address that now?
And in this thread "other than me" implies at least one person, which is enough to validate my response
0 -
I don't know, that sounds like you're just generalizing regular killer gameplay in the negative. I mean, following your logic, the same can be said about interrupting survivors as they're vaulting, repairing, cleansing, or hiding in a locker, considering those actions count as instant downs. I doubt anyone that engages in these activities is a toxic player, or admitting to their idiocy. They're just playing a game, my dude.
0 -
I said all the ppl in this thread that defended instadowns also defended dead hard. My saying other than me was pointing out the fact that im the only one youve been quoting HERE. You didnt validate anything at all.
0 -
This is what you said regarding the other post, copy and pasted: "ALSO post on the other thread defending the use of deadhard. Of the 3 pages...not 1 person."
But now they're suddenly defending instadowns and also defending hard? Try again.
"Other than me" dude, I only need it to me you to have someone to argue against. And you're saying not one person is in agreement with you here? Then who's upvoting your comments?
0 -
They ARE defending the use of both... You can litterally pick any 1 person who posted on this thread defending instadowns, and I can show you their post on the other thread showing how they also defended deadhard. Im not "argueing" against you, because theres nothing to argue here. Im just pointing out that you had a strawman in your head when you made your initial post about "hypocrite babies" because not 1 single person who posted to THIS thread matches your description.
1 -
I am, because I agree with the general gist of what he's saying.
I'm pretty new around here, I don't know either one of you, but I've found him to be a pretty chill dude so far and this thread was winding down nicely until you came along trying to start #########.
Idk if you two have a history or something, but all I've seen him be in this thread is laid back.
0 -
I have no clue who this guy is. As you can see from his post count, thats a new account. The majority of his posts have been made within the past few hours.
1 -
Yeah, dude came in hot so I assumed there must be a reason, but he's hitting it hard in the Dead Hard thread too.
0 -
You can see that the few guys who were joking around about their Leatherface chainsaws being OP... actually posted on that thread saying they had no problem with deadhard. I did the same. You dont even have to look very hard, since most of us replied within the first page. Pretty sure he just wanted to lump all killer mains who disagreed with him from the other page with us, without looking at who he was talking to on THIS thread.
1 -
Thats simply not true. The other thread is about ppl using dead hard too much and making a point against it so how are they defending it? I think I would know they're MY discussions.
Now, conveniently, we're focusing on this thread and some strawman that you think I made up. Did the other ppl who made similar sentiments make up the same strawman? You lied about the straw man in the last one saying EVERYONE was defending dead hard when they weren't and you're doing it with this one now.
0 -
You're "pretty new" because its a fake account made up by the guy arguing with me so you have someone to agree with you after you've been arguing with everyone here since page 1 of this thread. It's obvious and embarrassing.
Also, my comment didn't quote anyone, as stated many times yet I was adressed first. But I'm the instigator? Please.
0 -
Im talking about this thread, because this is the one that you posted to referring to ppl as "hypocrite babies". The people that youve argued with somewhere else...arnt here. Now, name 1 single person who has posted on this thread about instadowns being acceptable. Ill copy and paste that persons response claiming that dead hard is ok from the other thread, showing you that theres no "hypocrite babies" here.
0 -
Oh yeah, I've been starting threads bitching about the grind for new players and taking heat for it because I'm just so invested in the ruse. Get over yourself, Scrappy Doo.
And yeah, you waltzed in here spraying around terms like "hypocrite babies" and starting highly personalized tiffs with people over something that has nothing to do with this topic over behavior in a completely unrelated thread.
I've been content to watch from the peanut gallery because I found it kinda funny at first, but this kind of behavior seems weird and needy. Maybe get that checked out.
1 -
Who were you arguing with then? Because if that's the case then you were the one with the strawman on page one?
And you were the one that brought up the other thread trying to twist my words into your strawman narrative and now that you can't it's irrelevant cause they aren't here? Lol
0 -
Hes onto us...I mean me. I secretly made this account on the 31st of August, jsut so I could have an alt account agree with me incase this particular guy, who made his account yesterday... comes online.
2 -
Yoh even type the same, and bring up the hyppcrite babies thing in quotes and everything. At least change up the writing style between accounts so its less obvoius and cringey.
0 -
Are you really implying that I made an alt account BEFORE you ever made YOUR account, just so I could argue with you?
0 -
You-- I mean we-- I mean I am just clever like that. Xanatos gambits all the way down, baby.
No idea what you're talking about, I haven't been arguing with anyone. Didn't post on page one of this thread. I did agree with the OP of this thread that the killer sounded like a dick, I just encouraged him to relax a little.
On the Dead Hard thread, the only comment I made was to say that I assume every survivor has it as a precaution. Hell, I even liked some of your posts about how easy it is to bait Dead Hard because that's what I was referring to when I said it.
0 -
Always assume every survivor has Dead hard, balanced landing, BT and DS, unless proven oherwise. If you play according to these precautions, theyll never surprise you. Can say the same on the survivor side about assuming the killer has BBQ, nurses calling, blood warden and NOED.
1 -
Yea cause having two accounts is so unheard of. You probably do this alot.
0 -
We type similarly because we both use correct grammar and spelling. I'd encourage you to try the same but it's clear you have some deep-seated opposition to the idea.
And, you know, it might not take a worldwide conspiracy for multiple people to be offended by being called hypocrite babies for no reason.
But we really have reached peak "arguing over nothing" at this point, haven't we? Can we just back down from this cliff now?
0 -
The second quote was to your other account which you conveniently ignored cause you're wrong.
0 -
If by "nothing" you mean it's to the point that you can no longer back up your points so you back paddle by resorting to pointing out typos, then yes.
0 -
... what points have I been making, exactly? Aside from the fact that I find your highly personalized aggression toward strangers unnecessary and off-putting.
I'm genuinely confused about what you think is happening here.
1 -
I was just really hoping he'd try throwing Groot under the bus or something, so I could link their comment from the dead hard thread. Its really ironic that literally every last person on this thread defending instadowns actually DID post on the other thread.
0 -
But you're acting like I'm the ONLY one in here. Agression? You started with me witn both of your accounts. On page one someone uses the phrase "mindless killer mains". Every thread on this forum is loaded with that. You're just mad cause you got publicly proven wrong and called out on trying to twist my words.
0 -
No way, this is my heel turn. You're on your own.
I'd love to continue this conversation but I just don't have the proper psych training. I've said everything I can say. So long, it's been... bizarre and contentious.
Hakuna matata.
1 -
But... Dont you wanna join us "hypocrite babies"? You have a killer perk profile pic, so you MUST absolutely hate everything that survivors do and have, lol.
0 -
Agreed. Just be less obvoius next time, even down to the cringey fedora tipping "witty joke" style
"I'm tagging you in"
"No way it's my heel turn"
It all sounds like a bad creepypasta dialogue. It certainly has been bizzare. Goodnight.
0
