So no DS nerf until xmas at earliest
Comments
-
What is absolutely bs is that they decided that they shouldn't implement it when they have A DAM PTB. Hello that is what a ptb is for!! Letting us try something.0
-
Leave DS as it is. They make it harder and harder to be survivor in every patch. You need more survivors in the game to keep this game going remember that.1
-
@TheShowtime7 said:
Leave DS as it is. They make it harder and harder to be survivor in every patch. You need more survivors in the game to keep this game going remember that.if you need DS to survive you're probably not as good at the game as you think you are
2 -
yeet said:
@TheShowtime7 said:
Leave DS as it is. They make it harder and harder to be survivor in every patch. You need more survivors in the game to keep this game going remember that.if you need DS to survive you're probably not as good at the game as you think you are
If only one perk bothers you that much you are probably not as good at the game as you think you are.2 -
Just give us a nerfed version of it, it's been months!
It's a PTB for a reason so we can test it and give you feedback!
I think they won't ever balance it right, it's been too long.
1 -
fcc2014 said:
@SenzuDuck I don't get it. Increased healing time, adjusted pallets again, changed spawn of totem on hills, adjusted moonlight offerings, made NOED viable at all 3 tiers, Buffed the killer emblem while adding a nerf to chaser if you camp, added some asked changes to the Spirit. and to 2 terrible maps for Killers and made them smaller. Like what the hell more do you want per patch.
2 -
@switch said:
@fcc2014 said:
@switch kind of think you are the injured party. How a DS change which we don't even know what the end result of that change is , was somehow go to change the game entirely. I have a feeling it wasn't going to help you all that much. They continue to rework things and people still are not happy on both sides. Maybe just play the game or play something else. I mean you do like to quote Cote. Didn't he recommend that. Maybe this isn't the game for you.wanna bet 100$ that they will scrap dstrike idea forever?
I play this game since beta, you probably werent here when they tested 1 heal only ptb and scraped that like was nothing.Just like the SC idea got scraped
0 -
@lyric said:
@fcc2014 they left out survivor bots for these weak minded individuals it’s understandable they would be upset about not being able to set status effects and start people on the hook from the beginning, it doesn’t matter what they do it’s the same people bitching and moaning over and over again
I really hope they make a game mode with bots just so maybe some of these people can move on. I wanna see a "Bots are too op thread. 1 got the hatch!"
2 -
fcc2014 said:
@lyric said:
@fcc2014 they left out survivor bots for these weak minded individuals it’s understandable they would be upset about not being able to set status effects and start people on the hook from the beginning, it doesn’t matter what they do it’s the same people bitching and moaning over and over again
I really hope they make a game mode with bots just so maybe some of these people can move on. I wanna see a "Bots are too op thread. 1 got the hatch!"
1 -
Kill it already!
1 -
@DeadByFlashlight said:
@switch said:
@fcc2014 said:
@switch kind of think you are the injured party. How a DS change which we don't even know what the end result of that change is , was somehow go to change the game entirely. I have a feeling it wasn't going to help you all that much. They continue to rework things and people still are not happy on both sides. Maybe just play the game or play something else. I mean you do like to quote Cote. Didn't he recommend that. Maybe this isn't the game for you.wanna bet 100$ that they will scrap dstrike idea forever?
I play this game since beta, you probably werent here when they tested 1 heal only ptb and scraped that like was nothing.Just like the SC idea got scraped
Because they made healing in general, for everyone slower.
You'd rather them specifically target SC instead of targeting healing for everyone? You got a better nerf than originally intended and you still cry.
But what should I expect from the killer who cries about balance but intentionally plays at lower ranks so he can have an easier time playing against low ranked survs.
6 -
@SenzuDuck said:
But what should I expect from the killer who cries about balance but intentionally plays at lower ranks so he can have an easier time playing against low ranked survs.
With No Vaseline Sir, with No Vaseline!
5 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@DeadByFlashlight said:
@switch said:
@fcc2014 said:
@switch kind of think you are the injured party. How a DS change which we don't even know what the end result of that change is , was somehow go to change the game entirely. I have a feeling it wasn't going to help you all that much. They continue to rework things and people still are not happy on both sides. Maybe just play the game or play something else. I mean you do like to quote Cote. Didn't he recommend that. Maybe this isn't the game for you.wanna bet 100$ that they will scrap dstrike idea forever?
I play this game since beta, you probably werent here when they tested 1 heal only ptb and scraped that like was nothing.Just like the SC idea got scraped
Because they made healing in general, for everyone slower.
You'd rather them specifically target SC instead of targeting healing for everyone? You got a better nerf than originally intended and you still cry.
But what should I expect from the killer who cries about balance but intentionally plays at lower ranks so he can have an easier time playing against low ranked survs.
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.2 -
@Tsulan said:
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.I play both sides solo and with friends and my swf (when i play with them are all also rank 1). Quitting for easy games is worth mocking. Why play anything on easy mode?
4 -
@fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.I play both sides solo and with friends and my swf (when i play with them are all also rank 1). Quitting for easy games is worth mocking. Why play anything on easy mode?
Ask him, not me.
I play solo.2 -
fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.I play both sides solo and with friends and my swf (when i play with them are all also rank 1). Quitting for easy games is worth mocking. Why play anything on easy mode?
3 -
Well this thread heated up. Out of popcorn, cya tomorrow.
2 -
@lyric said:
fcc2014 said:@Tsulan said:
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.
I play both sides solo and with friends and my swf (when i play with them are all also rank 1). Quitting for easy games is worth mocking. Why play anything on easy mode?
Another thing I think is hilarious is they are bitching about getting penalized for the chaser emblem but they think survivors just swarm the hook without punishment when in all actuality your benevolent emblem suffers if you hook farm and more than likely it’s more than one of you getting injured/downed and no one gets gens done if they are swarming so in a sense its emblem for emblem, an eye for an eye on this situation, both are punished equally. Let’s not pretend like hook swarming happens on every single hook.
Only suffers if you don´t equip BT.
3 -
Tsulan said:
@lyric said:
fcc2014 said:@Tsulan said:
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.
I play both sides solo and with friends and my swf (when i play with them are all also rank 1). Quitting for easy games is worth mocking. Why play anything on easy mode?
Another thing I think is hilarious is they are bitching about getting penalized for the chaser emblem but they think survivors just swarm the hook without punishment when in all actuality your benevolent emblem suffers if you hook farm and more than likely it’s more than one of you getting injured/downed and no one gets gens done if they are swarming so in a sense its emblem for emblem, an eye for an eye on this situation, both are punished equally. Let’s not pretend like hook swarming happens on every single hook.
Only suffers if you don´t equip BT.
1 -
yeet said:
@TheShowtime7 said:
Leave DS as it is. They make it harder and harder to be survivor in every patch. You need more survivors in the game to keep this game going remember that.if you need DS to survive you're probably not as good at the game as you think you are
4 -
I'm hoping they make DS allow the obsession to get off only since they now are holding off on implementing the change.. we now have rancor so I feel its proper to allow the obsession to get off but the other 3 get that stun in place but not get off the shoulder...
Also yes the devs are working hard and making big changes to the game that make it better and I praise them for this patch........ but one thing that still hasn't been touched is the boring easy objective.... even when this patch goes live survivor life will still be boring and still be easy until they finally implement something for us to complete along with gens
0 -
@DarkWo1f997 said:
Yeah I’m using it at rank 13 because I’m a trashy survivor. Solo queuing is hard when the blueberries aren’t very smart. I don’t need it, I’m just not good enough to survive without it just yet, which in my opinion, makes it a crutch perk.
Try to ween yourself off of it and play more stealthy( window of opportunity, iron will, or urban evasion) may make better substitutes.
3 -
yeet said:SenzuDuck said:
@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
@SenzuDuck said:
ooft, almost like he said he shouldn't have to run perks to counter, damn. Nope, said you shouldn't have to run certain perks. Not run no perks. Not quite the same thing. So is that all you're gonna do? Put words in people's mouths and twist the words they do use? What a shock. Once again contributing nothing useful to anything around you. I read it as two response. Killers are supposed to be able top counter everything a survivor does without addons and perks Yeah they shouldn't, that's called good game design. they shouldn't have to run perks to counter pallets, gah. Someone should never feel forced to run certain perks.
survivors can counter everything a killer can do without perks, but apparently killers shouldn't be able to do the same.
Damn... whats that thing called? I'm struggling... like, I'm sure there's a way to entirely remove survivors out of the match, can't quite put my tongue on it.
It looks something like this.
I'm glad you've conceded that you don't have an argument.
Because killing isn't a counter at all, is it?
Can survivor actually stop you hitting them?
Can they stop you breaking pallets?I'm not entirely sure what survivors actually CAN counter against a survivor.
7 -
fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.I play both sides solo and with friends and my swf (when i play with them are all also rank 1). Quitting for easy games is worth mocking. Why play anything on easy mode?
It's not like you literally just advocated for this "playstyle" in a recent thread.2 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@DeadByFlashlight said:
@switch said:
@fcc2014 said:
@switch kind of think you are the injured party. How a DS change which we don't even know what the end result of that change is , was somehow go to change the game entirely. I have a feeling it wasn't going to help you all that much. They continue to rework things and people still are not happy on both sides. Maybe just play the game or play something else. I mean you do like to quote Cote. Didn't he recommend that. Maybe this isn't the game for you.wanna bet 100$ that they will scrap dstrike idea forever?
I play this game since beta, you probably werent here when they tested 1 heal only ptb and scraped that like was nothing.Just like the SC idea got scraped
Because they made healing in general, for everyone slower.
You'd rather them specifically target SC instead of targeting healing for everyone? You got a better nerf than originally intended and you still cry.
But what should I expect from the killer who cries about balance but intentionally plays at lower ranks so he can have an easier time playing against low ranked survs.
If a perk is used in more than 90% of all loadouts, then this needs to be adressed.
Same applies to BBQ and ruin btw.The underlying game mechanics have to be changed when certain perks are mandatory.
Also you blame me for deranking, but still you play SWF with low rank survivors.... guess thats ok then
4 -
Nickenzie said:yeet said:SenzuDuck said:
@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
@SenzuDuck said:
ooft, almost like he said he shouldn't have to run perks to counter, damn. Nope, said you shouldn't have to run certain perks. Not run no perks. Not quite the same thing. So is that all you're gonna do? Put words in people's mouths and twist the words they do use? What a shock. Once again contributing nothing useful to anything around you. I read it as two response. Killers are supposed to be able top counter everything a survivor does without addons and perks Yeah they shouldn't, that's called good game design. they shouldn't have to run perks to counter pallets, gah. Someone should never feel forced to run certain perks.
survivors can counter everything a killer can do without perks, but apparently killers shouldn't be able to do the same.
Damn... whats that thing called? I'm struggling... like, I'm sure there's a way to entirely remove survivors out of the match, can't quite put my tongue on it.
It looks something like this.
I'm glad you've conceded that you don't have an argument.
Because killing isn't a counter at all, is it?
Can survivor actually stop you hitting them?
Can they stop you breaking pallets?I'm not entirely sure what survivors actually CAN counter against a survivor.
I've been in rank 1 many times as a killer (as a survivor as well ofc) and i can confirm there's more drama than actual facts regarding game's balance.
I get it, people get upset when they "lose" and tend to forget when they are succesful, but that's not an excuse to be complaining about everything.
When i get rekt the first thing that comes to my mind is "was it my fault?" and most of the times it was.6 -
Tsulan said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@DeadByFlashlight said:
@switch said:
@fcc2014 said:
@switch kind of think you are the injured party. How a DS change which we don't even know what the end result of that change is , was somehow go to change the game entirely. I have a feeling it wasn't going to help you all that much. They continue to rework things and people still are not happy on both sides. Maybe just play the game or play something else. I mean you do like to quote Cote. Didn't he recommend that. Maybe this isn't the game for you.wanna bet 100$ that they will scrap dstrike idea forever?
I play this game since beta, you probably werent here when they tested 1 heal only ptb and scraped that like was nothing.Just like the SC idea got scraped
Because they made healing in general, for everyone slower.
You'd rather them specifically target SC instead of targeting healing for everyone? You got a better nerf than originally intended and you still cry.
But what should I expect from the killer who cries about balance but intentionally plays at lower ranks so he can have an easier time playing against low ranked survs.
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.
if you can’t see the difference between intentional and accidental then you don’t really have a case tbh.
ive had a team of three green ranks going against rank one killers, ive had it all. I don’t specificslly target any rank and I don’t specifically ask certain ranks to join.
But hey, it’s you and you just like arguing.5 -
@Raccoon said:
I guess easy mode doesn't include dc'ing so someone else can get the hatch instead of playing it out when downed.
It's not like you literally just advocated for this "playstyle" in a recent thread.
Not going to be held hostage so someone can get a 4k. bleeding out 3-4 minutes while someone searches for the last person. I play as killer at red ranks and don't pull that garbage. If i get 3 kills that is a win plus, i don't care or need the 4k. My ego doesn't need that stroke maybe others do.
9 -
Nice diatribe.
However you try to spin it, ruining someone else's game for YOUR mistakes (or because you can't handle a legitimate strategy) is scummy.2 -
@SenzuDuck said:
Tsulan said:@SenzuDuck said:
@DeadByFlashlight said:
@switch said:
@fcc2014 said:
@switch kind of think you are the injured party. How a DS change which we don't even know what the end result of that change is , was somehow go to change the game entirely. I have a feeling it wasn't going to help you all that much. They continue to rework things and people still are not happy on both sides. Maybe just play the game or play something else. I mean you do like to quote Cote. Didn't he recommend that. Maybe this isn't the game for you.
wanna bet 100$ that they will scrap dstrike idea forever?
I play this game since beta, you probably werent here when they tested 1 heal only ptb and scraped that like was nothing.
Just like the SC idea got scraped
Because they made healing in general, for everyone slower. You'd rather them specifically target SC instead of targeting healing for everyone? You got a better nerf than originally intended and you still cry.
But what should I expect from the killer who cries about balance but intentionally plays at lower ranks so he can have an easier time playing against low ranked survs.
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.
I play with anyone that joins, that’s the fun thing, I could have someone join who’s rank I’ve never seen before, but obviously intentionally going against lower ranked survivors Is exactly the same as not knowing which ranked killer you will go against.
if you can’t see the difference between intentional and accidental then you don’t really have a case tbh.
ive had a team of three green ranks going against rank one killers, ive had it all. I don’t specificslly target any rank and I don’t specifically ask certain ranks to join.
But hey, it’s you and you just like arguing.
You don´t have to justify yourself for playing with randoms, which happen to be at a lower rank than yourself. But don´t try to mock others for doing basically the same thing, with switched roles.
Btw. This is not arguing. We aren´t even discussing. I´m just expressing my disapointment, while you don´t see anything wrong in your actions.
6 -
That's great.
You should buy one for the next time you're slugged.
3 -
That's an interesting way to say, "Rage quit during unfavorable end game scenarios."
I'm sure this is the only scenario where you mash that DC ;32 -
Nickenzie said:yeet said:SenzuDuck said:
@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
@SenzuDuck said:
ooft, almost like he said he shouldn't have to run perks to counter, damn. Nope, said you shouldn't have to run certain perks. Not run no perks. Not quite the same thing. So is that all you're gonna do? Put words in people's mouths and twist the words they do use? What a shock. Once again contributing nothing useful to anything around you. I read it as two response. Killers are supposed to be able top counter everything a survivor does without addons and perks Yeah they shouldn't, that's called good game design. they shouldn't have to run perks to counter pallets, gah. Someone should never feel forced to run certain perks.
survivors can counter everything a killer can do without perks, but apparently killers shouldn't be able to do the same.
Damn... whats that thing called? I'm struggling... like, I'm sure there's a way to entirely remove survivors out of the match, can't quite put my tongue on it.
It looks something like this.
I'm glad you've conceded that you don't have an argument.
Because killing isn't a counter at all, is it?
Can survivor actually stop you hitting them?
Can they stop you breaking pallets?I'm not entirely sure what survivors actually CAN counter against a survivor.
4 -
Tsulan said:
@SenzuDuck said:
Tsulan said:@SenzuDuck said:
@DeadByFlashlight said:
@switch said:
@fcc2014 said:
@switch kind of think you are the injured party. How a DS change which we don't even know what the end result of that change is , was somehow go to change the game entirely. I have a feeling it wasn't going to help you all that much. They continue to rework things and people still are not happy on both sides. Maybe just play the game or play something else. I mean you do like to quote Cote. Didn't he recommend that. Maybe this isn't the game for you.
wanna bet 100$ that they will scrap dstrike idea forever?
I play this game since beta, you probably werent here when they tested 1 heal only ptb and scraped that like was nothing.
Just like the SC idea got scraped
Because they made healing in general, for everyone slower. You'd rather them specifically target SC instead of targeting healing for everyone? You got a better nerf than originally intended and you still cry.
But what should I expect from the killer who cries about balance but intentionally plays at lower ranks so he can have an easier time playing against low ranked survs.
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.
I play with anyone that joins, that’s the fun thing, I could have someone join who’s rank I’ve never seen before, but obviously intentionally going against lower ranked survivors Is exactly the same as not knowing which ranked killer you will go against.
if you can’t see the difference between intentional and accidental then you don’t really have a case tbh.
ive had a team of three green ranks going against rank one killers, ive had it all. I don’t specificslly target any rank and I don’t specifically ask certain ranks to join.
But hey, it’s you and you just like arguing.
You don´t have to justify yourself for playing with randoms, which happen to be at a lower rank than yourself. But don´t try to mock others for doing basically the same thing, with switched roles.
Btw. This is not arguing. We aren´t even discussing. I´m just expressing my disapointment, while you don´t see anything wrong in your actions.
playing with whoever wants to play because I’m a nice guy is very very different.
And I’ll happily continue playing no coms swf if they start forcing us to play high ranked killers only bc I don’t care, I just enjoy the game3 -
Vietfox said:Nickenzie said:yeet said:SenzuDuck said:
@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
@SenzuDuck said:
ooft, almost like he said he shouldn't have to run perks to counter, damn. Nope, said you shouldn't have to run certain perks. Not run no perks. Not quite the same thing. So is that all you're gonna do? Put words in people's mouths and twist the words they do use? What a shock. Once again contributing nothing useful to anything around you. I read it as two response. Killers are supposed to be able top counter everything a survivor does without addons and perks Yeah they shouldn't, that's called good game design. they shouldn't have to run perks to counter pallets, gah. Someone should never feel forced to run certain perks.
survivors can counter everything a killer can do without perks, but apparently killers shouldn't be able to do the same.
Damn... whats that thing called? I'm struggling... like, I'm sure there's a way to entirely remove survivors out of the match, can't quite put my tongue on it.
It looks something like this.
I'm glad you've conceded that you don't have an argument.
Because killing isn't a counter at all, is it?
Can survivor actually stop you hitting them?
Can they stop you breaking pallets?I'm not entirely sure what survivors actually CAN counter against a survivor.
I've been in rank 1 many times as a killer (as a survivor as well ofc) and i can confirm there's more drama than actual facts regarding game's balance.
I get it, people get upset when they "lose" and tend to forget when they are succesful, but that's not an excuse to be complaining about everything.
When i get rekt the first thing that comes to my mind is "was it my fault?" and most of the times it was.3 -
Nickenzie said:I understand, sometimes it is your fault for losing but saying that "You are bad" isn't a excuse for EVERY thread. Period.
And telling people to get better isn't calling them bad, this is another thing the killers I tell this too don't understand, they're too sensitive.Post edited by Seanzu on4 -
Nickenzie said:Vietfox said:Nickenzie said:yeet said:SenzuDuck said:
@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
@SenzuDuck said:
ooft, almost like he said he shouldn't have to run perks to counter, damn. Nope, said you shouldn't have to run certain perks. Not run no perks. Not quite the same thing. So is that all you're gonna do? Put words in people's mouths and twist the words they do use? What a shock. Once again contributing nothing useful to anything around you. I read it as two response. Killers are supposed to be able top counter everything a survivor does without addons and perks Yeah they shouldn't, that's called good game design. they shouldn't have to run perks to counter pallets, gah. Someone should never feel forced to run certain perks.
survivors can counter everything a killer can do without perks, but apparently killers shouldn't be able to do the same.
Damn... whats that thing called? I'm struggling... like, I'm sure there's a way to entirely remove survivors out of the match, can't quite put my tongue on it.
It looks something like this.
I'm glad you've conceded that you don't have an argument.
Because killing isn't a counter at all, is it?
Can survivor actually stop you hitting them?
Can they stop you breaking pallets?I'm not entirely sure what survivors actually CAN counter against a survivor.
I've been in rank 1 many times as a killer (as a survivor as well ofc) and i can confirm there's more drama than actual facts regarding game's balance.
I get it, people get upset when they "lose" and tend to forget when they are succesful, but that's not an excuse to be complaining about everything.
When i get rekt the first thing that comes to my mind is "was it my fault?" and most of the times it was.
By saying "more drama than facts" you should be able to guess that i'm not talking about every single thread.2 -
Nickenzie said:Vietfox said:Nickenzie said:yeet said:SenzuDuck said:
@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:@yeet said:
SenzuDuck said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
@SenzuDuck said:
ooft, almost like he said he shouldn't have to run perks to counter, damn. Nope, said you shouldn't have to run certain perks. Not run no perks. Not quite the same thing. So is that all you're gonna do? Put words in people's mouths and twist the words they do use? What a shock. Once again contributing nothing useful to anything around you. I read it as two response. Killers are supposed to be able top counter everything a survivor does without addons and perks Yeah they shouldn't, that's called good game design. they shouldn't have to run perks to counter pallets, gah. Someone should never feel forced to run certain perks.
survivors can counter everything a killer can do without perks, but apparently killers shouldn't be able to do the same.
Damn... whats that thing called? I'm struggling... like, I'm sure there's a way to entirely remove survivors out of the match, can't quite put my tongue on it.
It looks something like this.
I'm glad you've conceded that you don't have an argument.
Because killing isn't a counter at all, is it?
Can survivor actually stop you hitting them?
Can they stop you breaking pallets?I'm not entirely sure what survivors actually CAN counter against a survivor.
I've been in rank 1 many times as a killer (as a survivor as well ofc) and i can confirm there's more drama than actual facts regarding game's balance.
I get it, people get upset when they "lose" and tend to forget when they are succesful, but that's not an excuse to be complaining about everything.
When i get rekt the first thing that comes to my mind is "was it my fault?" and most of the times it was.2 -
Don't mock fDC2018's patented technique!3
-
SenzuDuck said:Nickenzie said:I understand, sometimes it is your fault for losing but saying that "You are bad" isn't a excuse for EVERY thread. Period.
And telling people to get better isn't calling them bad, this is another thing the killers I tell this too don't understand, they're too sensitive.SenzuDuck said:In this thread - bad killers needing their hand held everywhere they go. and honestly - getting upset at end game chat that you can hide.SenzuDuck said:Unfortunately this is what bad killers suggest when they need babying through the match. If he'd just get better he'd realise it isn't that bad.SenzuDuck said:Killers are weak. Always will be, you know why? Because the bad ones would rather moan and complain or gloat about an update on a forum instead of actually getting better at the game.6 -
@Nickenzie said:
It's not that every killer main is bad tho, yes there is SOME killer mains that are bad however telling a killer main to "Get gud" in every post won't always be the solution to the problem. Sometimes there's a ACTUAL problem and getting better won't solve it. See where I'm coming from @SenzuDuck?Oh absolutely, I have definitely said there are bad killers, but it usually isn't directed at someone.
In this thread - bad killers
Not directed at anyone, just the ones that are in that thread moaning about whatever it is they're moaning about (out of context, btw)
Unfortunately this is what bad killers suggest when they need babying through the match. If he'd just get better he'd realise it isn't that bad.
At the end of this comment I literally say "if he'd get better". Another comment out of context though, this is fun.
Killers are weak. Always will be, you know why? Because the bad ones would rather moan and complain or gloat about an update on a forum instead of actually getting better at the game.
Again, this comment I literally talk about getting better at the game, and refer to them as being weak killers at the start. In the middle I absolutely call them bad because THE BAD ONES do constantly moan on this forum. (another out of context comment, yaaaaay)
There's a plethora of buffs for killers in this patch but all they can complain about is DS, those killers are BAD.
But i don't usually say "you are bad" which is what you apparently quoted me as saying, unless it's someone arguing pointlessly about something, like that one guy who thinks pallets being further apart is a survivor buff, he's definitely bad.
2 -
SenzuDuck said:
@Nickenzie said:
It's not that every killer main is bad tho, yes there is SOME killer mains that are bad however telling a killer main to "Get gud" in every post won't always be the solution to the problem. Sometimes there's a ACTUAL problem and getting better won't solve it. See where I'm coming from @SenzuDuck?Oh absolutely, I have definitely said there are bad killers, but it usually isn't directed at someone.
In this thread - bad killers
Not directed at anyone, just the ones that are in that thread moaning about whatever it is they're moaning about (out of context, btw)
Unfortunately this is what bad killers suggest when they need babying through the match. If he'd just get better he'd realise it isn't that bad.
At the end of this comment I literally say "if he'd get better". Another comment out of context though, this is fun.
Killers are weak. Always will be, you know why? Because the bad ones would rather moan and complain or gloat about an update on a forum instead of actually getting better at the game.
Again, this comment I literally talk about getting better at the game, and refer to them as being weak killers at the start. In the middle I absolutely call them bad because THE BAD ONES do constantly moan on this forum. (another out of context comment, yaaaaay)
There's a plethora of buffs for killers in this patch but all they can complain about is DS, those killers are BAD.
But i don't usually say "you are bad" which is what you apparently quoted me as saying, unless it's someone arguing pointlessly about something, like that one guy who thinks pallets being further apart is a survivor buff, he's definitely bad.
SenzuDuck said:@Nickenzie said:
It's not that every killer main is bad tho, yes there is SOME killer mains that are bad however telling a killer main to "Get gud" in every post won't always be the solution to the problem. Sometimes there's a ACTUAL problem and getting better won't solve it. See where I'm coming from @SenzuDuck?Oh absolutely, I have definitely said there are bad killers, but it usually isn't directed at someone.
In this thread - bad killers
Not directed at anyone, just the ones that are in that thread moaning about whatever it is they're moaning about (out of context, btw)
Unfortunately this is what bad killers suggest when they need babying through the match. If he'd just get better he'd realise it isn't that bad.
At the end of this comment I literally say "if he'd get better". Another comment out of context though, this is fun.
Killers are weak. Always will be, you know why? Because the bad ones would rather moan and complain or gloat about an update on a forum instead of actually getting better at the game.
Again, this comment I literally talk about getting better at the game, and refer to them as being weak killers at the start. In the middle I absolutely call them bad because THE BAD ONES do constantly moan on this forum. (another out of context comment, yaaaaay)
There's a plethora of buffs for killers in this patch but all they can complain about is DS, those killers are BAD.
But i don't usually say "you are bad" which is what you apparently quoted me as saying, unless it's someone arguing pointlessly about something, like that one guy who thinks pallets being further apart is a survivor buff, he's definitely bad.
3 -
@DarkWo1f997 said:
My goodness you don’t like admitting you are wrong.Except I'm not wrong because I never said I've never called anyone bad, lmfao.
1 -
SenzuDuck said:
@DarkWo1f997 said:
SenzuDuck said:@Nickenzie said:
It's not that every killer main is bad tho, yes there is SOME killer mains that are bad however telling a killer main to "Get gud" in every post won't always be the solution to the problem. Sometimes there's a ACTUAL problem and getting better won't solve it. See where I'm coming from @SenzuDuck?
Oh absolutely, I have definitely said there are bad killers, but it usually isn't directed at someone.
In this thread - bad killers
Not directed at anyone, just the ones that are in that thread moaning about whatever it is they're moaning about (out of context, btw)
Unfortunately this is what bad killers suggest when they need babying through the match. If he'd just get better he'd realise it isn't that bad.
At the end of this comment I literally say "if he'd get better". Another comment out of context though, this is fun.
Killers are weak. Always will be, you know why? Because the bad ones would rather moan and complain or gloat about an update on a forum instead of actually getting better at the game.
Again, this comment I literally talk about getting better at the game, and refer to them as being weak killers at the start. In the middle I absolutely call them bad because THE BAD ONES do constantly moan on this forum. (another out of context comment, yaaaaay)
There's a plethora of buffs for killers in this patch but all they can complain about is DS, those killers are BAD.
But i don't usually say "you are bad" which is what you apparently quoted me as saying, unless it's someone arguing pointlessly about something, like that one guy who thinks pallets being further apart is a survivor buff, he's definitely bad.
SenzuDuck said:@Nickenzie said:
It's not that every killer main is bad tho, yes there is SOME killer mains that are bad however telling a killer main to "Get gud" in every post won't always be the solution to the problem. Sometimes there's a ACTUAL problem and getting better won't solve it. See where I'm coming from @SenzuDuck?
Oh absolutely, I have definitely said there are bad killers, but it usually isn't directed at someone.
In this thread - bad killers
Not directed at anyone, just the ones that are in that thread moaning about whatever it is they're moaning about (out of context, btw)
Unfortunately this is what bad killers suggest when they need babying through the match. If he'd just get better he'd realise it isn't that bad.
At the end of this comment I literally say "if he'd get better". Another comment out of context though, this is fun.
Killers are weak. Always will be, you know why? Because the bad ones would rather moan and complain or gloat about an update on a forum instead of actually getting better at the game.
Again, this comment I literally talk about getting better at the game, and refer to them as being weak killers at the start. In the middle I absolutely call them bad because THE BAD ONES do constantly moan on this forum. (another out of context comment, yaaaaay)
There's a plethora of buffs for killers in this patch but all they can complain about is DS, those killers are BAD.
But i don't usually say "you are bad" which is what you apparently quoted me as saying, unless it's someone arguing pointlessly about something, like that one guy who thinks pallets being further apart is a survivor buff, he's definitely bad.
My goodness you don’t like admitting you are wrong.
Except I'm not wrong because I never said I've never called anyone bad, lmfao.
4 -
@DarkWo1f997 said:
SenzuDuck said:
AHH! HE BIT ME!Looks like you have an issue admitting you're wrong and instead pretend that you were baiting me, well done.
1 -
SenzuDuck said:
@DarkWo1f997 said:
SenzuDuck said:
AHH! HE BIT ME!Looks like you have an issue admitting you're wrong and instead pretend that you were baiting me, well done.
0 -
@DarkWo1f997 said:
SenzuDuck said:@DarkWo1f997 said:
SenzuDuck said:
AHH! HE BIT ME!
Looks like you have an issue admitting you're wrong and instead pretend that you were baiting me, well done.
HE BIT ME AGAIN! Angry Bubba noises
Oh, you're just Nickenzies upvote account, imagine backing yourself up with another account, I bet you double Lol'd me too,
2