General Discussions
General Discussions
Why did you """""""""""FIX""""""""" the twins bug when EVERYONE wanted it to stay?
There's still game breaking bugs with the twins from what i've seen yet those remain but 1 that benifits the twins and makes them feel better to play fixed ASAP.
Why Behavior? why are you so out of touch with what the community has to say?
Comments
-
They fixed this but completely left Twins broken and unplayable. They are literally going to make the whole 2 Twins mains that exist quit the game at this rate.
12 -
It's probably best that they don't leave bugs in the game but hopefully implement it officially in future after seeing all the feedback
3 -
they also added a new bug.. you cant see victors aura when he's attached to someone
7 -
The truth is they regret making twins and are trying to make them irrelevant that Noone plays them.
10 -
Because they straight up just don't like them.
8 -
Probably because if nobody plays Twins then they don't have to fix them.
9 -
I have to wonder why they don’t just killswitch ‘em at this point.
2 -
You can't really leave bugs in the game, even if you wanted to implement that feature it should be an intentional change.
Knowing this game, that same bug probably caused a survivor to gain bloodlust 1 permanently if the basement chest was opened while they were on hook or something.
3 -
No that's intentional. If the surv is trying to crush victor you can see his aura.
0 -
4 -
a bug is a bug and should be removed, simple as that
1 -
I couldn't care less about them removing a bug that technically made the Twins stronger. It's a bug, and unintentional.
However, this killer has had detrimental and game-breaking bugs for many months now, and we have heard next to no word of a possible fix on the horizon. Meanwhile, this switching bug didn't even make it to live from the PTB.
I understand that this might have been a lot more easy bug to fix, while the older ones are still needing more time. But the message that is currently being sent to players is not a very pleasant one.
2 -
ok so what about the game breaking ones instead of 1 making them slightly better?
1 -
That would put pressure on them yo fix the cause. Best to take the out of sight out of mind approach.
0 -
to everyone saying "a bug is a bug and should be removed"i agree-but why would they prioritize a bug thats just a qol change instead of one of the many, many, many bugs that make them unplayable?
2 -
fact
0
