We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

blocking killers

yauniqua
yauniqua Member Posts: 151
edited January 2023 in Feedback and Suggestions

wesker is boring but legion is awful.

are the devs offering survivors the ability to not join a lobby for certain killer?

i'd like a blacklist for legion.

Post edited by Rizzo on
«1

Comments

  • solarjin1
    solarjin1 Member Posts: 2,222
    edited January 2023

    i would pick tombstone myers

    also when i play wraith the swf flash lighters survivors feel like killers so I'll like to ban them too.

    also ban legion

  • Brimp
    Brimp Member Posts: 3,051

    People would already do this with p2p servers when they were a thing and legit some people would never find matches or needed a VPN. My friend was a pig main back in the day when you could just plop a rbt on someone end game and it didn't need to be active to kill the survivors that try to exit the gate and safe to say he 100% needed a vpn. Even then people made programs to see what killer they were going against and it would instantly DC them from pre game lobbies.

  • thrawn3054
    thrawn3054 Member Posts: 5,897

    I mean, I know it would cause massive problems but I sure would be happy to never see Dredge again.

  • littlepaw
    littlepaw Member Posts: 67

    i feel like there's at least 4 people on at all times that want to go against a nurse or blight, me included (not nurse though) so you're a little overdramatic with that 'literally never', although I do get that their queues would be considerably longer because if people had the option to not go against the top 2 killers they probably would pick it

  • yauniqua
    yauniqua Member Posts: 151

    hoping this is implemented. i'll take longer queue times if i never have to face a legion again.


    the games are always thrown by other survivors.


    solo queue queen here

  • HoodedWildKard
    HoodedWildKard Member Posts: 2,013

    Meh, only killer i think people should be able to blacklist is clown if they have coulraphobia. Maybe plague (have a friend who has an irrational hatred of vomiting and playing plague makes her super uncomfortable)

    Not like people can ban a hero on overwatch or avoid certain maps on games.

  • Piruluk
    Piruluk Member Posts: 995

    Yeah solo survivor is unplayable.

    It's almost always Legion, and that killer press a button injure every survivor, and see their aura all the time. If survivors only knew what to do, but never because matchmaking is made for killer mains. So yeah 0 skill killer, just press a button requires zero mechanical skill, see you, can't outrun etc.

    Surprise surprise about 50% of games vs legion.

    Any serious game let players to ban something. But dbd no

  • burt0r
    burt0r Member Posts: 4,163
    edited January 2023

    Funny that all those games let the players choose their character during lobby and not go with a fixed character into queue, hm?

    Also since when is DBD a "serious game", i thought it was a "CaSuAl PaRtY game"? /S

  • BrightWolf
    BrightWolf Member Posts: 444

    The only real problem with Legion is that they encourage bad habits in new/baby killers (I know this for a fact, because I play Legion a lot) and that people group up around them making it easy af to get their chained-frenzy and deep-wound off.

  • yauniqua
    yauniqua Member Posts: 151

    still hoping 4 an implementation like this.

  • Anteares051
    Anteares051 Member Posts: 4
    edited January 2023

    they're not going to ever implement a change that negatively affects someone who plays a specific killer, least of all the killers queue time. IF they're so problematic they'll nerf the killer

    so many people use "boring" as a reason to hate pretty much every killer in the game, generally anti-loop killers. Yes, I agree, Legion, an M1 killer and one of the easiest killers to loop in the game, is boring.

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 401

    They should let survivors ban 2 killers and let killers ban 2 maps.

    Survivors will very likely not all ban the same killers, so it will barely affect queue times. People blindly think it will just be Nurse when in reality there are tons of killers that are more annoying to play against, like Pinhead, Knight, Plague etc...

    And it's much better to have a queue take maybe 15 seconds longer than have people DC in the 1st minute and ruin the whole match because they didn't like the killer.

  • dbd900bach
    dbd900bach Member Posts: 734

    Although a good idea, the actual implementation of it would be rather difficult when considering the current system. The devs are trying hard enough as it is to pair same skilled players, so adding more things would just skew this even more

  • Zeb89AceGamer
    Zeb89AceGamer Member Posts: 41

    There's literally a % of people that exclusively throw the game because they are facing a certain killer they don't like, so better add this feature but just with the possibility to add one killer, and we will see how it goes.

    If nurse is really that hated, the devs will finally decide to rework her power

  • H2H
    H2H Member Posts: 772

    Let me block all SWFs and/or anyone using Dead Hard and I’d go for it.

  • Nihlus
    Nihlus Member Posts: 301

    I say we also make it so the killer can't leave the pregame lobby then either without DC penalty. Why do you get to dodge games you think won't be fun, but not us?

  • Nihlus
    Nihlus Member Posts: 301

    I think that's a bad analogy. A better one would be: People keep leaving your store because you treat them like garbage the moment they walk in the door. Sometimes, you even hit one in the face ten seconds after they enter. So intead of treating the problem(you), you want a one-way door that traps them into your store while you harass them.

    Treating the symptoms instead of the problems will make sure the problem itself never goes away. It will ensure you slowly lose business though.

  • BlightedDolphin
    BlightedDolphin Member Posts: 1,888
  • StarLost
    StarLost Member Posts: 8,077

    ...Who even does this anymore?

    Like, unless it's an obvious hacker or something then - sure?

    Also, how on earth are the two remotely comparable. Dodging the lobby doesn't lock all four survivors into the next game. Killers can't just suicide...you do know this right?

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903

    Beside the suspected hackers : Wraith or Hag in a four-flashlights lobby. I'm not that much of a masochist.

  • StarLost
    StarLost Member Posts: 8,077
    edited January 2023

    I'll just bring Franklin's on either. Hag...yeah, that's going to depend on map.

    IWOM? Midwich? Autohaven maps? I'll give it a try.

    Ormond?

    But nah, worst case scenario - I probably lose, or I need to play mean to stand a chance.

    The only lobbies I'll dodge are:

    • Legacy cosmetics and a private profile/anon mode/less than 1,000 hours. Nope, you're a hacker.
    • Someone I played against before and they were either very suspicious, very rude or were AFK.
    • Uhhh...

    No, that's about it. Like - some matches (4 medkits for example) you know are probably going to be impossible, but it's still just a loss.

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903

    My usual opponents are already pretty annoying without flashlights (I'm only average with her and I get full teams who know exactly how and when to disarm the traps while working each on his gen. I don't need flashlights into the mix.)

  • StarLost
    StarLost Member Posts: 8,077

    Oh yeah, people know how to handle Hag now - but you can still do some tricks. I just poop traps out as I go, and try to never be floating traps.

    They go at the tops of staircases, around corners, behind vaults, down pits etc. After a while they get so paranoid that they're spending all their time disarming my traps.

    The only folks that give me the fizzy poops are the ones who'll follow you around from the get go, disarming traps and being uncatchable with your slow speed.

  • Riski
    Riski Member Posts: 208

    Sounds cute but doesn't this just end up pushing killers for playing killers who are popular by giving them a long queue? Like "oh wow everyone loves playing [insert killer here], we're so glad everyone brought and is enjoying this chapter and as a special reward have a longer queue." On one hand, it would be nice to incentivise more variety but oh no I got my blight daily so I must be punished with a queue that's twice as long for trying to complete it.

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903

    It always end-up like your last type of survivors.

    Additionally, they never get a cam swing from the traps so it's pretty much powerless against them.

  • Triplehoo
    Triplehoo Member Posts: 698

    Sure.... Why not. As long as killers can see who is in SWF and survivors are locked to their build when they enter lobby. So no last second switch anymore.

  • yauniqua
    yauniqua Member Posts: 151

    Killers aren't going to get avoided. But casuals that play Wesker nonstop will have to pick various killers :)

  • StarLost
    StarLost Member Posts: 8,077

    ...Wesker?

    Wesker is fine. Fair and powerful. Who's salty about Wesker?

    I'm more concerned with killers like Legion, Trickster, Trapper, Hag and Bubba.

  • Zexbunny
    Zexbunny Member Posts: 209

    Everyone would just block nurse or blight and those killers would have trouble finding games. A blacklist is a bad idea.

  • xEmoGirlxAlexisx
    xEmoGirlxAlexisx Member Posts: 613

    So u want that Killers going to have Endless Q Time because Survivors are going to Block every Killer except Pig, Trapper, Onryo and Freddy ? 🤷‍♀️

  • TeabaggingGhostface
    TeabaggingGhostface Member Posts: 3,108

    Thatll be added when killers get to block any survivors with perks they don't like

  • Sonzaishinai
    Sonzaishinai Member Posts: 7,976
    edited January 2023

    I hope they implent this but when you choose a killer to not face you just don't get any matches at all anymore as a april fools joke

    Or make you are locked with a crying baby charm

  • lemonsway
    lemonsway Member Posts: 1,169

    I don't think adding more useless matchmaking parameters will make things better...Imagine that you now can avoid every Nurse and Blight and PinHead player, those guys will never get matches within reasonable time. Not only that you're negating all the effort those players put in playing those killers for however long they have. It's simply unfair and unjustifiable.