Nerf Deadlock

Why not?

Regression and also blocking to a degree is already overnerfed (dms only 30 seconds now and weaker corrupt after 6.1.0)

It depends what your definition of camping and tunneling is.

If you keep one gen high then you would not see DL really hit other gens. This is because you need to have gen 1 done to hit gen 2 and gen 3 will hit a random gen since gen 2 would be blocked for 30 seconds. The other 2 survivors would have their gens done and do 2 new gens and finish p2 first gen last.

So basically p1 hits p2 and p3 hits nothing. P2 would save vs camper with p1 while p3 starts gen 4. Gen 4 hits gen 2 and gen 5 would also hit gen 2. Then you would just go to gen 2 and finish it making the perk waste little time.

True Killer Genregression Perks should loke like this.

After sucsessfully perform one hit on every survivor the gen with the most progress regress by 1%.

After hitting all survivors ones the Perk deactivats.

ok sry. If you hit all survivors for the first time the survivor on the gen with the most progress get a skill check, that is 50% bigger and if the survivor miss it than 1% genprogress is gone.

Just No...

Deadlock, like Corrupt Intervention, is a well-developed perk that is healthy for the game. Even I, as the main survivor, have to say that.

The real problem is tunneling and camping, that's correct. BUT, have you ever played Killer yourself against a cordinated SWF and not playing a chase killer like (Nurse, Blight, Wesker, Spirit). You have almost no other option than to play like this, otherwise after about 5-6 hooks they are already through the exit.

There just needs to be more rewards for not tunneling. The new Pain Resonance is a good example. Overall as a Killer you should get a small buff after hanging a fresh survivor where the next gen regress interaction will be boosted a bit.

But just my 2 cents.

if you "have to" face camp and tunnel in order to beat people "of your own skill level," they're not of your own skill level. if they were at your skill level, you wouldn't need to resort to those strategies because you would have even chances of winning while engaging in normal gameplay

(to be fair, tunneling and face camping are strategies that are supposed to be strictly bad, and the developers have stated they don't want that to be the way people play the game. the fact they're seen as good strategies shows there's still a lot of balance issues to work out. that people even have that option to use is a "failure" of the devs)

???

me: the developers know tunneling is a strategy people use, and they're trying to balance the game so it's no longer effective and people can win about 50% of their games without using it

you: have you considered people know this is a strategy that exists?

i didn't say "no skill" i said "not at the same skill level." i didn't say they "guarantee [a] win" i say they're far more effective than intended. if the killer will lose while being outmatched regardless of camping and tunneling then why are so many people saying it's the only way to win some games? (those are directly contradictory)

I never said they were bad strategies, I said the devs want them to be far less effective. when the devs have said they want to make changes to the game that reduce the effectiveness of camping and tunneling, and in many consecutive patch notes they say "we hope this change will reduce the effectiveness and prevalence of tunneling and camping" i take it to mean that they're trying to reduce the effectiveness of tunneling and camping as a strategy.

everything you've said is responding to a point i never made, sometimes even agreeing with things i said; or just being wrong