The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

The Unknown's Cosmetics and an Appeal to the Devs

GeneralV
GeneralV Member Posts: 11,291

So, the Unknown has barely released and we are already seeing cases of it being used for transphobia, as described on a recent thread by @Iron_Cutlass :

I understand this thread of mine is perhaps being written earlier than necessary, after all at the time this is being written we've received no official word from BHVR. However, I believe it is important to make haste this time, because of two reasons:

1- The lack of a license being involved would allow for a hastily action.

2- We may very well see those cosmetics being removed. This is, of course, based on the only other example we have: Smart Face.

Now, I am not sure how many were here for that; some Forum members got banned, others joined, and it all happened a while ago. As someone who was here, trust me when I say that it isn't exactly pleasant to revive this topic. But due to the similarities, I believe it is needed.

For those who are unaware, Leatherface's masks were not removed overnight and everyone was immediately okay with that, no. As a matter of fact, the whole thing was a massive debate in the Forums with several discussions, threads and even polls about it. A lot of feedback was given, but in the end it did not seem to matter that much.

Obviously, no one was opposed to racists being banned from the game. There is no excuse for racism, as there is no excuse for the cases of transphobia being currently reported. Awful people do not deserve to play DBD, and BHVR was absolutely right in removing those players from the game.

Another issue, however, was the removal of the cosmetics themselves, not only Smart Face but all four masks available. Picture for reference:

That was never acceptable. Some awful people chose to act in a disgusting manner, and it cost everyone else some of the best cosmetics in the entire game. They were an unique type of unlockable, something that no other killer had and, to this day, something that no other killer has. They perfectly made the connection between Dead by Daylight and Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

And yet everyone paid the price for the actions of awful people who shouldn't be here to begin with.

Now, once again we have a situation of cosmetics being used in a disgusting way. And I would like to leave an appeal to the devs for the situation to be handled in the proper way this time:

Please improve your report system, make sure each and every transphobic player gets punished and banned, but leave the cosmetics alone.

«1

Comments

  • Kaethela
    Kaethela Member Posts: 348

    Link the cosmetics so people stop using them to be #########. No need to get rid of them entirely.

  • TragicSolitude
    TragicSolitude Member, Alpha Surveyor Posts: 7,354

    I wouldn't care about them linking the cosmetics if it didn't include the weapons. I want to be able to change weapons regardless of the killer's appearance.

    I'm tired of the weapons being bound to linked sets across all killers, but with the Unknown the weapons are very different, and the axes are boring as hell.

  • katoptris
    katoptris Member Posts: 3,180

    I missed those cosmetics of Leatherface dearly. I was even hoping for more faces to wear whenever a new survivor comes out.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,291

    It certainly is. Thank you, btw, for pointing out how the lack of a license allows for hastily actions.

    I hadn't realized that, and it is important to leave this feedback here ASAP.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,291

    I had 3 of them: Leaderface, Athleteface and Smartface. Never had the chance to get Survivorface because they removed them during my attempts and no one plays Jake.

    Still, it was such a cool idea for an unlockable cosmetic!

  • OrangeBear
    OrangeBear Member Posts: 2,775
    edited March 14

    It's just easier to remove the tools that toxic trolls use rather than waiting for them to use them before banning them. Because it doesn't stop them from using them and causing harm in the first place, it only stops them from doing it afterwards but only on that account it is used it on. They can just come back. And these types of people are never going away. It's more efficient for the support team as well who i think are already overloaded, it takes weeks sometimes for support to get back to you.

    I think BHVR should just make those outfits sets. I think it's the most effective and least disruptive solution.

  • Starrseed
    Starrseed Member Posts: 1,774

    it was fantastic and when i first saw the unknown i really hoped they could revive that idea and give us diffrent skins representing the survivor but then reality crashed i and reminded me that this can never happen cause it would probably spawn the same argument again even so i think it would be diffrent this time

  • OrangeBear
    OrangeBear Member Posts: 2,775
    edited March 14

    I mean, cosmetics are a form of expression. Devs can decide what cosmetics are available which dictates what expressions are available.

    Problem with the unknown cosmetics is that it allows you to mix the cosmetics in a way to resemble a harmful stereotype. If they made the outfits sets then you couldn't do that anymore.

    To be clear, i am not saying the outfits should be removed, i think that would be going too overboard and it would limit the character too much. Only that the head and body pieces of the current very rare and rare outfits of the unknown should be unbreakable.

    The price is you wouldn't be able to mix those items anymore which i think is a small price to pay.

    The benefit is that people wouldn't be able to use those cosmetics to cause harm anymore. It would save support resources. Cause the problem with these scenarios as well is you can't prove the people using those cosmetic combinations are trying to be transphobic. Especially when they try to do it implictly, and as well if they don't express that in the game themself, they can't ban based on things on other platforms.

    So, that's why i think it would be an effective and least disruptive solution.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,291

    Honestly, same.

    Cause the problem with these scenarios as well is you can't prove the people using those cosmetic combinations are trying to be transphobic.

    And that proves my point.

    What about the people who are just mixing and matching their cosmetics? Why should their experience be affected, even if only slightly, by the actions of awful individuals?

    Transphobic individuals have no place here. They should be permanently banned immediately. No warnings, no second chances.

    But we are talking about turning the cosmetics into sets. Which, as you know, are hated by the community. It is better than a full removal, but it isn't a good solution either.

  • OrangeBear
    OrangeBear Member Posts: 2,775

    The point i was trying to make is that bad actors can act in a way that doesn't get them banned. They can wear those cosmetics with bad intentions, but if they don't break the rules, you can't ban them. They can wear the cosmetic combination to portray a harmful stereotype, because the game lets them do that and it's not against the rules. I think the game should not let them do it. Don't allow them to express a harmful stereotype.

  • Marc_go_solo
    Marc_go_solo Member Posts: 5,327

    The simplest solution would be to designate sets as male and female sets, so you can mix and match sets which share the same sex, but cannot combine beyond that range. That way, it prevents the option of transphobia, whilst not removing any cosmetics from the shop. It would restrict the variety, but I'd rather that than any removal of cosmetics.

    The most ideal way would be to perma-ban, but banning IP addresses or accounts are often countered because people just make new accounts or change IP. Although I'm not well-versed in what can be done, I'm unaware of any thing that can be done to ban a player by putting a lock on their console or PC. Accounts and IP addresses are free, and so long as the game is downloaded they don't have to pay again to use it.

  • 100PercentBPMain
    100PercentBPMain Member Posts: 1,068

    Do this and I demand a refund...straight up. You can link those sets over my dead Trans body

  • KateMain86
    KateMain86 Member Posts: 2,374

    So how do you discern the difference between genuine reports of this and those where killer players are reported out of spite? The only way you can as far as I know is if the killer basically admits to it when the match is over. This is problematic from all angles.

  • Nazzzak
    Nazzzak Member Posts: 5,660

    It's gotta be hard when it comes to reporting because they have to sift through all the reports on tunnelling, teabagging, camping, looping, etc, that waste their time just to get to cases like this. I can see why taking the tools away from bigots is the easiest option.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,291

    They can create a new report category, or have people look at those reports specifically. It is, of course, possible to filter reports, look for the ones which actually need to checked.

    Obviously I don't have all the answers, but I just cannot accept good cosmetics being removed because of disgusting individuals, again. If there is any chance to avoid that, I have to try.

  • Chilli_man2400
    Chilli_man2400 Member Posts: 2,914

    Ok so apparently the VA of the unknown has come out and refuted the statement

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,291

    Alright, quick update:

    Apparently it has been out for a few hours now, but the VA released a statement on Twitter about the situation.

    Thanks @GoodBoyKaru for sharing it on a different thread.

    And it looks like the skins aren't going away! Well, this is a relief.

    I gotta say I was expecting the worst here.

  • KateMain86
    KateMain86 Member Posts: 2,374

    If they leave this to the report system I feel like its going to be endless false reports mixed in with some genuine ones. They can do that, just like how they could've before, but will they be able to filter out all the bad ones? They messed up by removing leatherface's cosmetics. Now they are held to a standard regarding situations like this because of how a similar situation was handled before. This is why you can't overreact to situations like this. Universal punishment because of what an extremely small amount of people do is wrong.

  • Nazzzak
    Nazzzak Member Posts: 5,660

    I didn't realize it had gotten to this point (though I'm not too big on social media, especially twitter) that people were calling for a boycott. The devs have done nothing wrong. The VA not being in the know was likely because of them trying to contain the leaks, nothing nefarious.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,291

    Yes, I didn't have the full picture either. Until now, that is.

  • Ayodam
    Ayodam Member Posts: 3,123
    edited March 15

    Wait I’m confused. First she said she was potentially gonna pursue legal action and she felt ’tricked’ by BHVR and stuff but now she’s… saying we should back off because BHVR isn’t responsible for people using the character to harass transwomen?? I’m totally confused now. What exactly is she wanting people to do here? I know she’s saying ‘leave it alone’ but what does that even mean now?

  • supersonic853
    supersonic853 Member Posts: 5,542

    Yeah someone was able to dig up the deleted tweet and im a bit confused. She seemed a lot more against bhvr at one monent. And was basically trying to turn the witch hunt on them. But i guess the tones changed a bit after they talked?

  • Ayodam
    Ayodam Member Posts: 3,123

    It’s good that she’s received support from BHVR for the harassment but it seems her initial reaction was hasty and presumptive. She typed that a non-binary voice actor may have been better suited to provide lines for the character (in a tweet I believe she has also since deleted), but now I’m confused why her providing voice lines brought her discomfort. This character isn’t trans or even human. And it certainly isn’t a replica of her personally. She is a character actor and this is a video game monster. Reflecting now I must wonder if maybe she’s somehow intertwining herself into the fabric of the character. I don’t know why it would bother her to provide voice lines for it otherwise.

  • Pulsar
    Pulsar Member Posts: 20,784

    Maybe for you, someone relatively unaffected.

    I kinda expected better from you, honestly.


    Consider the people it DOES affect. I learned, painfully, that having a competition over suffering is a fool's race. What affects you may not affect another in the same way. It's why we have empathy.

  • JeanGreyarea
    JeanGreyarea Member Posts: 498

    Damn, you know when the general speaks, everyone should shut up and listen

    and yes i agree with you

  • Nazzzak
    Nazzzak Member Posts: 5,660
    edited March 15

    I'm wondering if some of the playerbase approached her and convinced her she'd been duped or something, and BHVR of course had to assure her that no, that wasn't their intention. I just hope this situation doesn't stop the team from giving more opportunities to trans actors (who notoriously struggle to break out in the entertainment industry). It's hard because BHVR have been able to more or less curb major leaks recently and obviously keeping most of their employees in the dark is how they did it. Obviously the VA was not aware of why she was kept in the dark (or she was but some players have convinced her it was something more nefarious). It seems things are clear to her now and she wants the furore to calm down now.

  • OnryosTapeRentals
    OnryosTapeRentals Member Posts: 1,035

    I just hope this situation doesn't stop the team from giving more opportunities to trans actors

    The damage is already done IMO.

  • GoodBoyKaru
    GoodBoyKaru Member Posts: 22,809

    This is all speculation, however I'd argue that she was probably feeling very annoyed and very attacked last night following the amount of vile attacks she and others were receiving. It's likely that she was emotional and hurt. Bhvr probably reached out, offered apologies etc, and as of this tweet they've been on good terms. She deleted quite a few tweets and that community post last night, and then probably some more this morning.

    What it looks like now is that she and BHVR are on good terms again, and while the lack of communication is upsetting she realised she was directing a lot of anger at BHVR that should've been directed at the community.

    Again, I am not Zoey Alexander (I wish I was her singing voice is killer) and cannot pretend to know her personally, so this is all entirely speculative based on her most recent tweets.

  • GoodBoyKaru
    GoodBoyKaru Member Posts: 22,809

    The survivor VA is also (technically, though I don't know if they identify as it themselves) trans so I don't think every bridge has been burned just yet.

  • DragonMasterDarren
    DragonMasterDarren Member Posts: 2,848

    COD Lobbies being some of the vilest places to be does not automatically mean every other lobby in every other game has to be like that

  • Dustin
    Dustin Member Posts: 2,306

    Regardless of the reason I would agree that the report system BHVR has as a whole could use improvements. There have been recent feedback changes for players reporting which is great but there's still a lack of tools / options for players.

    I doubt the cosmetics go anywhere but I'd hate to see them restricted in some way because a minority of losers who play DBD.

  • Starrseed
    Starrseed Member Posts: 1,774
    edited March 15

    Yeah I love when people say stuff like

    "Being soft like that you would've never survived cos lobby or xbox live lobbys!"

    Gues what girlie pop youre innocence and mental health did not either



    Edit cause i obviously cant walk and write at the same time

  • OnryosTapeRentals
    OnryosTapeRentals Member Posts: 1,035

    Hopefully not 🙏

    BHVR have always been strongly pro-LGBTQ+ so I’m hopeful this won’t deter them.

    I do think it might unfortunately lead to them setting future Unknown cosmetics though. I guess time will tell.

  • Ariel_Starshine
    Ariel_Starshine Member Posts: 937

    I said it another thread and I'll say it here.

    correlation is not causation!!!

    Ban the people behaving this way not the cosmetic.

    Be mindful how you use self disclosure online, especially in an online pvp game. I'm not in any way justifying their behavior (it's sickening) but we have to be aware what we choose to share online.

    I do not share any information about myself whatsoever in dbd. I don't need to be doxxed and have people know who I really am. I play anon, and my profile is hidden. Not worth the stalking/hitting on I'd deal with if they knew. We can't control others so keep that in mine when self disclosing info.

    Again, not justifing their actions, but if I can prevent something I will for my own sanity.

  • Ariel_Starshine
    Ariel_Starshine Member Posts: 937

    Exactly. This is what I meant when I said correlation is not causation. They'd have to do a LOT of research and testing to figure this out, which I doubt they have the resources for.

  • Ayodam
    Ayodam Member Posts: 3,123

    I hadn’t considered this. You could be right. Maybe she had devils whispering in her ear.

  • anarchy753
    anarchy753 Member Posts: 4,212

    I hate the implication that using cosmetics is automatically evidence towards some sort of hatred.

    Add onto that that I, and I assume many other players, haven't once looked at a survivor and noticed their charms (unless they're the ones that are all lit up and you see them when they're trying to hide) and I think the "I get tunneled for my charms" holds a lot less water than I think people think it does.

  • LegacySmikey
    LegacySmikey Applicant, Member Posts: 618

    Well done for making such an important & well written post my friend,

    Haven't been on the forum or game for a week, personal issues, but sad to come back to read stuff like this.

    Not really much to add I agree with everything you said & hopefully this will turn into one of those mega post threads & the devs will take action quickly as well as actually banning these people we don't need or want in our game!

  • Starrseed
    Starrseed Member Posts: 1,774

    that is absolutly right i had the same thoughts back when buba was the problem. how would you know that i tunnel you for reason x while i use the cosmetic in question. i could just tunnel thats what many killers do all day long

  • Mooks
    Mooks Member Posts: 14,800

    The problem is that people go out of their way to let the player know they were targeted.

    in case of in-game chat or even player name I suppose it’s easy for BHVR to take action. But there are edge cases where the attacker knows how to use words in a way to not actually break any rules but still be clear enough. There are many homo-/transphobes on these forums that do this as well.

    also, and probably more relevant, those that target the players outside of the ga - eg on the players profile, platform direct messages or streams. BHVR can’t take any action here and it’s completely out of their hands even if they wanted to act. Btw that was the case with Bubba - many streamers were directly harassed in-game and on Stream but to an extent that BHVR couldn’t do anything and streaming platform didn’t act/care or whatever.