The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

I think these pallets need to be included in 1v4

Rudjohns
Rudjohns Member Posts: 2,200
edited November 22 in Feedback and Suggestions

Or at least 1 of them. Another one could be included downstairs

Thompson House might the THE most killer sided map right now, not even one of the most. Sometimes the left side of the map (considering the main building being at top) is a complete dead zone. And this main building is probably the worst in the game, not even a single pallet to play with, and the vaults are atrocious

What do you guys think?

Post edited by Rizzo on

Comments

  • Rudjohns
    Rudjohns Member Posts: 2,200

    Oh yeah because the map by default only has 1 god pallet (shack)

  • Autharia
    Autharia Member Posts: 399

    The one by the window isn't a god pallet. You drop it and you only have 1 window way out that they have faster access to trapping you there till they break it or you mess up.

  • GoodBoyKaru
    GoodBoyKaru Member Posts: 22,810

    I actually think that the pallet by the window would be alright to include in 1v4. While it would be a god pallet in the traditional sense, there's still counterplay due to the small distance between the pallet and the window. Pallet fakes could work on more inexperienced survivors, but also the forced medium vault during break animation and lack of ability to hold forward in any direction while the killer has to break it means that it won't be that good as a distance making tool. Ranged killers like Huntress and Trickster would be fine, but even Slinger should be able to hit over it, and again as it's so enclosed on one side Trapper and Hag can easily get hits by vaulting the window, while killers with a quicker pallet break (ie Demo Bubba and Billy) could reduce distance further. Yes, it's a strong pallet that can't be mindgamed, but the benefit from dropping it is nowhere near the benefit of a traditional God pallet, and it can help give more resources to a main building in desperate need of them without being that strong.

    The other one, on the far left of the image, I am less of a fan of. Sure you can mindgame away some distance, but I prefer pallets that stand a chance to be played or, failing that, aren't that strong once dropped.

  • sizzlingmario4
    sizzlingmario4 Member Posts: 6,941

    The one closer to the window would probably be fine.

    The other one I would be against adding.

  • Langweilg
    Langweilg Member Posts: 1,310

    I’d rather have the downstairs window buffed. The upper area feels already alright, but I would be fine with either one of them.

  • GoodBoyKaru
    GoodBoyKaru Member Posts: 22,810

    Agreed, with the exception of Cowshed. That map can stay as is, just with old-school graphics.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,377

    Maybe Cowshed can be adjusted separately from the others.

    Because I don't think it is a good map the way it currently is, but considering it was very unbalanced in the past a full reversion probably wouldn't work either.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    We don't need more God Pallets in 1v4, some of the maps have enough of those already. We could arguably need more weak pallets to help chain loops, but we do not need more God or Strong pallets. Or god/strong windows for that matter.

  • Rudjohns
    Rudjohns Member Posts: 2,200

    We dont need more god pallets…literally in a map with 0 god pallets

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,476

    It's a really, really badly designed tile, even the variations with no windows on the backside. The survivor can just wait inside, and reaction vault for free 3 times, not even having to use the pallet. If you try to push them the other way, where it's an actual 50/50 at the window, they push around to the back, which you can't mindgame either because they see you almost the whole way around, and then back to the same unfair window situation.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,476

    You're assuming the killer has a trap power. That doesn't mean anything for all the others.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436
    edited November 22

    We don't need extra God Pallets in the game, period. One or two per map is more than enough. And Thompson House has a Shack, that IS a God Pallet.

    They have to consider the other half of the roster for which yes, a tile like that would be a massive issue. You cannot just design the tiles like every Killer is Nemesis, Xenomorph, Wesker, Legion, or Blight. You have to consider Killers that must play around tiles, too - EVERYONE has to play on these maps.

    The Cowshed Maps are a bit too Killer-sided, I agree. Mostly, Thompson due to size and Rotten Fields due to complete absence of anything useful there. I think they can fix it by adding a COUPLE more filler, junk, or line of sight breaker tiles. No more strong vaults or pallets however; we had too many last time and it made the maps pretty abysmally Survivor-Sided. Really, I do think Rotten Fields could be retired, it won't ever be good, and I think we could make Thompson House a LITTLE larger. I also think maybe we do not need both Abattoir and Cowshed, they're both basically the same map anyway. Lose one or the other?

  • Rudjohns
    Rudjohns Member Posts: 2,200

    Shack should not count since almost all maps have one, and the maps that don't have a killer shack definitely have several other god pallets, so at the end of the day Thompson House is probably the only map with 0 god pallets

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    But Shack DOES count and IS a God Pallet. Saying "But that doesn't count because not all maps have a shack" is like saying "Well the easy 3Gen on the I-shaped maps should not count because not all maps have an easy 3gen." And besides, most maps have God or Strong pallets regardless of there being a shack or not; the point is moot because every map does in fact have at least one God Pallet, several strong pallets, a shack, or a pretty strong Main that creates a safe zone.

    Besides that, what is even wrong with a map not having any God pallets? Do you really need a God Pallet, or can we make do with some strong Pallets and strong tiles instead? I really don't think every map even needs a God pallet, God window, or super strong Main, let alone ALL those in combination. BHVR has been trying to move away from that sort of design for good reason - because it's obscenely frustrating on Killer Side, especially for those who play M1s, to know there's some areas you just can't chase in because they are too safe for Survivor.

  • ad19970
    ad19970 Member Posts: 6,442

    The solution here is to make sure RNG can't screw over survivors so much anymore by increasing the minimum amount of pallets that can spawn on a map. Something quite a few maps in the game need desperately. Adding one god pallet in Thompson House won't do the trick.

    RNG might be good for the game in a whole but it shouldn't affect the amount of pallets that can spawn so much.

    I fail to see how Thompson House is more killer sided than Haddonfield though.

  • ad19970
    ad19970 Member Posts: 6,442

    Cowshed in my opinion is generally very well balanced now. The best coldwin farm map.

    In general I don't think coldwin maps need to be reverted or redesigned, they just need their minimum amount of pallets increased noticeably, so that you don't end up with maps that have too little pallets.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,377

    I don't think that would be enough, to be honest, because the tiles themselves are also extremely weak. Survivors need resources in order to survive, and the Old Coldwind realm used to provide said resources.

  • Rudjohns
    Rudjohns Member Posts: 2,200

    I'm not saying the map needs a god pallet, I'm saying the maps needs more pallets. The main building is the weakest of all the maps, plus the rest of the map is a complete deadzone

  • Rudjohns
    Rudjohns Member Posts: 2,200

    Haddonfield? The map that some people here are still asking for a survivor nerf?

  • ad19970
    ad19970 Member Posts: 6,442

    Some tiles are weak, but Coldwin maps definitely have tiles that are strong as well. The new tile they added just recently is a bit weak, but other than that they have quite a few tiles that are the same as those of other maps. And the Coldwin specific tiles range from weak to very strong.

  • ad19970
    ad19970 Member Posts: 6,442

    Never seen anyone that thinks that Haddonfield is still survivor sided, but I guess people like that still exist. That map in my eyes is pretty killer sided.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436
    edited November 22

    Then the fix isn't making Main stronger, the fix is adding a few weaker fillers and making the map a little bigger. If the issue is that the map is a big deadzone, concentrating more and stronger pallets in the main doesn't solve the issue - it just makes an overly frustrating and stronger Main while the rest of the map is STILL a deadzone.

    I've also lowkey NEVER seen anyone here or elsewhere ask for further Survivor nerfs to Haddonfield. The general consensus is it's a Killer-sided map for the most part now.

  • Rudjohns
    Rudjohns Member Posts: 2,200

    I did a little search for 2 minutes and I found 2 comments of people mentioning Haddonfield as balanced or "not killer sided" from just a few months ago

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    Two. Two people saying this. To… how many again saying it's not? Maybe you should also search that, just saying. You'd find a lot more than two people over the last few months calling Haddonfield Killer sided. Which it is.

  • ad19970
    ad19970 Member Posts: 6,442

    Ok they said it's balanced. That's not the same as arguing that it's survivor sided. Nevertheless, everyone has their own opinion in the end, but the vast majority seems to agree that Haddonfield is killer sided.