Do you agree that both sides are equally toxic?

This thread kinda proves your point.

@TreemanXD how ya figure?

So you're in agreement with giving the death penalty to jaywalkers? After all, the law is the law, and degrees of severity don't matter.

PS: Nobody's defending toxic behavior, people are just pointing out the difference in severity.

I'm going to go on a limb here, and say that this game has way more toxic Survivors than Killers. Yes, both exist for both sides. But for who has the most? Definitely Survivors.

Most post-game chats with a SWF will usually have one or two prodding the Killer if they won. Of course if they lost, they'd say nothing cause they either left or... You get the idea.

But even out of a SWF, you'll still come across that one guy who BMs in game (Not like I care for t-bags anyways) or talks crap in chat.

Well, I get more toxicity from survivors.

Survivors not only are toxic to the killer, but also to their teammates.

If I play solo most killers are neutral to friendly.

@Judith Name one or more people who insulted you or acted toxic themselves. Quote it and I'll retract my statement on the subject of being civil.

@Judith How awfully convenient.

I have no ill will towards you, especially since we have spoken before. I will say this, that attitude will not get you far. If you want to ignore this, fine, but it wouldn't look well when people want to talk with you. Have a good day.

@LordGlint Pfft. That made me chuckle. But seriously, if I wanted to be toxic, people would see it. As it is now I don't really feel anything at the moment so it's hard for me to express myself better.

@Shad03 nah, i was jk. People throw that word around for EVERYTHING. Like someone said earlier, hit someone on the hook? TOXIC. Threaten to murder someones whole family? TOXIC

ahh, each side has their own people that can be toxic as hell. though it isn't too apparent in killers, it's still there regardless.

i wouldn't say they're too equal, but i have seen survivors taking more of the backlash for being toxic because they're in a group rather than being one sole person.

I don't see the Killer side as much, I am a Killer main and it is a super sociopath thing for me, don't really get bothered by the Survivors who t-bag and flashlight, those ones I end up killing anyway, come on, if you're gonna try to make the Killer have a bad time, learn how to play.

Survivor side, I play SWF only, like how everyone plays it, as friends. Not to gain a competitive advantage. I'll have a few Killers I piss off because I run them around and all. Some that will target me, big deal, I'll just move to the next game, I will deal with teammates who will sandbag and all. Potato teammates, blah blah blah.

I see more Survivors over all that will run all 2nd chance perks, and tell me what to do and not to do, try to impose these rules and claim I tunnel even though I saw them out in the open from FAR away, just get over the anger, not worth it.

From my personal experience Survivors tend to be much more toxic than killers, The chance of running into a toxic killer are there but the chances of running into toxic survivor(s) is much higher from what I can tell.

Looking at the postgame chat alone, i've seen killers get ######### for doing too well and for not doing well enough. I feel bad because it's a loose loose situation with those kinds of players and they always try to bring the killer down after the game no matter the outcome.

@Shad03 “people claiming one side is lore toxic than the other is just a one-side main with a bone to pick and a narrative to push’

“Anyone who plays both sides knows that survivors are disproportionately more toxic”

that isn’t exactly civil.

@Judith To talk to people is up to you, but to claim to, and I quote:

Is pretty 'toxic' when some people weren't even being that insulting.

Anyways, that's the nature of the forums, as well as the op. People disagreed with you, but I guess you can't handle that. I don't want to be condescending, nor do I want to insult you. But you DID make this thread and it's liable to get a killer vs. survivor argument especially considering people are the forums are more likely to be killer main adjacent.

I pointed out the people who were insulting, it isn’t a good thing that stuff like that starts, why should our community stay so divided?

Okay let me be fair, it's more or less just petty then.

Even then, we've spoken on several threads and for the most part have been on friendly terms. Are you just going to ignore me now cause I disagreed with you? My point is, don't hold a grudge from a single thread onto others. I'm not telling you what to do (people rarely listen to my advice anyways), but I am suggesting you calm down and take a moment to read and think.

You can set privacy so that non friends can't send you messages.

I don't want our community to be divided, but that will not ever change @TreemanXD. We're humans, we're stupid. However, the people you pointed out weren't insulting. They gave their sides, and examples. They didn't call anyone stupid, they didn't say anything threatening. They gave their peace. And the third guy you mentioned was just condescending, but his opinion was as valid as the rest.

That's fine, just be aware you have said it before.

You don’t have to feel insulted for an insult to be an insult.

@Judith Reread a lot of the posts made here. A lot of the people were saying that the toxicity was more PRONOUNCED in the survivors due to there being four of them. We all know both sides are toxic, however, you are more likely to see a toxic survivor.

Being a survivor or Blendette doesn't automatically make you toxic. The problem is that since there are FOUR people, there is proportionally more chances of meeting a toxic survivor.

The same could be said for killers. Not every Leatherface is a toxic camper, but more likely then not you'll meet a toxic basement camping Leather Daddy.

@TreemanXD To call those insults would be stretching more so then possible. I don't know, maybe I see insults more bluntly, but I honestly don't see how those were insulting.