Brokenbones

Been a long road, maybe after this you can finally retire in peace. I'm hoping for the best myself as someone who also wants the best for freddy

It's sad until you think about how close 2025 really is tbh Kinda mad how fast the year's gone by

Bump Logic

They tend to nerf the addons that are universally considered must-have objective upgrades to the basekit to promote addon variety

Scott's not a convincted criminal, I think that's the big difference with that I get what you mean though.

Calling it tragic is a bit much though. Nobody has died from FNAF being put into DBD. That's what actual tragedy is imo. And don't get me wrong, people are completely within their right to be upset about it, totally. I respect that POV. The franchise's top dude donated some money to people with abhorrent beliefs and values…

I hope they completely destroy the idea of playing SM out of spite Go back to playing Nurse if you're gonna be spiteful

I keep forgetting ST is back, I'm really out of the loop LOL

It's a slight buff to kinship and reassurance too which is interesting now 1 reassurance can make a hook stage last 100 seconds, almost 2 minutes lol

Fits more than certain characters who are in the Killer category so, yeah

If you wanna fix SMs reputation, you should probably try convincing people that playing against her is fun and worth their time instead of trying to 'objectively' prove xyz. Most people who complain about her don't really care what argument they use, they just know they hate her. That's what it seems like to me.

imo you won't ever save her reputation. i mean this in good faith, I'm sure you've done your homework and that what you've got to say about her gameplay makes sense but that will never change the fact that I despise this character and would be much happier if she was removed from the game entirely. To me personally, Skull…

No mither only on survivor. No items no offerings. Bring on the pain.

smh clickbait on dbd forums. what's this place come to

Okay then here's my counter argument Instead of asking for a bug to remain unfixed, petition behaviour to add it as a basekit feature. The reason people aren't and won't do this is because it's unreasonable, you're asking for one of the strongest killers in the game to be buffed and it's obvious it won't happen but imo…

One of LilithOmen's own arguments in his video from a while ago defending hug tech literally boils down to "bump logic is stronger and survivors will hate it more" aka they will find it more boring to go against. If people really feel strongly about this then ideally they should be campaigning for this to added…

I don't know how people can say he's weaker with the stuff being removed but then say oh it's a gamble/show off it's stronger to play him normally. Personally I've vsed hundreds of blights both bump logic/tech trying ones and there is no difference between how "sweaty and boring" they are when they are trying hard to win.

Again there's a disparity, there's people saying blight's only interesting because of this bug that's going away But in the same breath there's people saying most blights are average and never used it anyway. It doesn't make any sense lol.

So you're saying Blight is a boring killer then. That's all I get from this response If some people think a bug was the only thing that made Blight fun then idk what to say that's hilarious.

It gets rid of having to drop survivors to adren check them, always found that kinda stupid for both sides to deal with

People claiming to be Blight fans defending hug tech by saying "normal" blight is boring/too easy lol

My post has nothing to do with ridiculing or shaming. I don't really care what you believe I'm just pointing out a fact. If you're trying to be helpful and empathetic to a community and their issues, you probably shouldn't go around calling a hideous creature wearing human clothes a caricature of that community. This…

Again calling it a 'caricature' is only doing harm and is perpetuating the notion that there's any truth to it, which there is not. People really need to stop calling it that, I don't understand how people who are trying to 'help' are going around saying that It is nowhere near the claudette bubba mask thing, at least that…

You must be trolling right, there's no way you genuinely believe what you wrote in this post If you believe that image you posted is in any way is a caricature of a real person, I don't really know what to say. Also for someone concerned about "how this is affecting others" you sure seem to not care that you're going…

I know you have the best of intentions but even implying that a hideous monster with human clothes and hair stretched on it is somehow even a caricature of a real group of people, is both not helping and insulting to even say if you ask me Just because the bad actors are 'claiming' it doesn't mean you have to legitimise…

Ideally it shouldn't matter if it has too much or too little It should reach a point where BHVR does their thing and makes cool characters. If those characters just so happen to be from certain backgrounds or have certain identities then it's just one part of their whole thing instead of making it the central focus. It…

Not necessarily, voicing your complaints is an integral part of improving something. If nobody ever complained nothing would ever improve imo That being said I do understand what you mean and there are people out there who do try to misuse that to try to get things they simply don't like changed or removed etc. Was that…

Sure you can argue it's a needless or pointless change But that doesn't make it censorship.

Again that's not what censorship is Creators can change their minds on their work, as long as the reasoning comes from them and not some external force like say, a ratings board or a publisher it's by definition not censorship. People changing their work with the benefit of hindsight is fine as long as it's not needless or…

If you create something and you (as the creator) are unsatisfied with it then go back and change it, that's not censorship at all. It's not the same thing.

To call it censorship is misguided, censorship implies somebody made it and then an external force came in and censored it. In actuality, BHVR likely looked at some complaints regarding the icon and decided it's better to change it than to leave it be The problem I have is with the lack of consistency, I.E Hangman's trick…

I don't wanna say I called it but I called it

But Peanits response says the icon might be an unnecessary reminder of those kind of thoughts, which is why it got changed So my question is: How is an icon of somebody blatantly tying a noose any different? I get that the in-game context is different but it's the exact same thing and if you ask me, it makes it look like…

Daily reminder BHVR changed this offering icon but to this day have not changed the perk 'Hangman's Trick' despite that perk being even worse with it's icon due to it literally being somebody tying a noose The perk was even updated semi-recently so, it just goes to show if you ask me

Ah, they used IS okay That's neat then. I'm still skeptical on the idea of bundles but this is objectively a good change for newer players as it's a considerable reduction in grind

Where does it explicitly say the shard price will be 50% Because I'm not seeing it. Maybe the auric cell price will be but I'm skeptical if it's not mentioned explicitly.

More so showing appreciation that a practice I complained about was changed But like I said I'm not holding my breath, It's just as likely they'll do it again with the next original release

Daily reminder we called this, this thread is proof of that People said oh it's ok its just christmas outfits, its just old halloween outfits People just put up with it and they're milking it. This is why you should always speak up if you hate crap like this, even if you don't think it'll make any difference

I stopped playing last month after finishing the rift Struggling to get motivation to start playing again, the newest amount of stagnation has hit harder. The increase of blatantly greedy practices with DLC pricing, the refusal to address stuff like MFT, Blight, Buckle up and so on has increased frustration. Most DBD…

They probably already had a reworked idea ready in case the buff did nothing They saw the overwhelming negative response and probably went something like "Yeah this change isn't gonna be well received, we should just push the rework instead" That's my guess

Otzdarva used to make up random perk names on his stream, and one of them was broken bones. I found it funny and stole it I picked sloppy butcher icon because mangled icon is a bone broken in half that's it

No, Ultimate weapon had a bug fix that made it work properly

"It'd be really cool to have a fancy reward for hitting P100, but at the same time, that's an insane amount of progress and we don't want people to feel like they're missing out by not hitting it." Translation: We won't make any money from it, so it's not worth the effort.

1st priority is addons I like (Killer only) Then 2nd priority is cakes, puddings and bps rest is auto buy filler

Honestly I'm happy to see this since the original DBD maps are undoubtedly some of the best I just wish we had the swamp rework first, that realm is such a stain on the game right now

Good thing I never said it was the ONLY reason he got that hit. I will say I agree with the point that he could've got the hit without it but it doesn't change the facts; the player used it to get the hit. You can't deny that, it's factual. Even then, all I said was you can't call this stuff "ok" and expect survivors to…

Big content creator tweeted that on a certain killer, it's really powerful Then added their own opinion to it So yeah ur basically right

It doesn't matter lol He shouldn't be able to do it in the first place, I get what you're trying to say but I don't get why you're defending Blight being able to break the rules of the game like this.

Again I already said staying in an open room vs Blight is a bad idea But it doesn't change the fact you seriously cannot ever expect survivor players to think in their heads "maybe this blight will somehow glide on top of map geomtry and hit me". I'm gonna repeat myself, that's completely ridiculous.

Yeah I'm sure the survivor had the foresight to go "Hm yes, I must go into this room because Blight can jump off of an elevated location and, using his overtuned speed addons, casually glide on top of map geomtry" Like yeah I agree staying in the open area vs a Blight is a bad idea regardless but you seriously can't think…