EverflowingRiver

me: ** **** **** them: ******

Did you come back from your acid trip yet?

By your logic the words “he” and “she” should be banned. You might be misgendering someone.

This is almost comical. Why would I admit to being wrong when I’m not wrong? I can’t emphasize enough that you don’t understand what a wild card is. No disrespect, maybe it’s simply a language barrier or something like that. The only other alternative is you are just trying to mess with me. You refuse to acknowledge when…

What an immature response. Once again, I can only come to the conclusion that since I disagree with you, you have to try to dismiss my opinion. But then again, you don’t know the definition of wild card so my bar was set pretty low.

Don’t bother responding. I just posted another, but I’m guessing you will always want 1 more. Plus, the title of the first one directly contradicts what you are saying.

https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/205496/the-promised-lgbt-characters/p1 another. Second paragraph or so she said it’s not even debatable that one is needed

This poster declared it a need

Then explain the multiple threads asking for it then

Yes, and before that you said no one. I’m genuinely glad you changed from an absolute position to allowing for exceptions.

Look at my last post. My point stands

You posted that any depiction in media of a lgtbq person would have helped you during your younger years. You even brought up it might have stopped your attempt on your own life. when i get to a computer proper I’ll quote it for you if you like. And before the mods or you get upset, notice I didn’t contradict your life…

Just a few pages ago @GoodBoyKaru said just that. You don't even read what those who agree with you post.

Half the people here have demanded an openly gay character. People have even claimed they don’t feel like they can identify with video game characters without it. let me say again, since we as players don’t know who the character is, they are a wild card to us. Therefore the lore is open to interpretation. If the devs want…

Point out where I said they should exclude them. I’ll wait. You always make that same argument in every thread. “If you have any reservations about how the character is created (not if they should be but how) then you are actively excluding them”

do you know which character it is? So they are a wild card.

We want the creative team to flow, but they better flow in the direction of a gay character or we will make a ridiculously long thread about the lack of said character. Revisit my post discussing sally on a previous page please, it is worded better then my one regarding frank

You are only angering yourself. Who are you to say my point of view is stupid? That’s the definition of close minded

So someone disagrees with you and your first response is to get angry and assume they are stupid? That’s flat out sad man. I wish the best for you; gotta stay calm out there. I actually try to keep an open mind. That’s why I continue to post. Seems you only want to brow beat though

I’m trying to make a point. Not my fault you label anyone who disagrees with your world view as a troll.

Funny, you seem to be the one getting upset. You are so upset you typed profanity in some of your messages. Like, you made a conscious effort to try and prove how upset you are. I’m calmly trying to show you that just because the lore says sally had a husband, doesn’t mean sally is a biological female. That’s the point,…

Hope this helps

I literally don’t know how to explain how a wild card works. I can’t hold your hand through all this

Official canon gives one character as a wild card in terms of gender or sexuality. Who are you to tell me who it is. Thus any predefined relationship is open to official interpretation

“so yes we KNOW every mentioned relationship is heterosexual. And we know there is at least one char LGBT+ (not necessarily gay). It may very well be a char said has had a heterosexual relationship confirmed. We don’t know said.” You literally contradict yourself. And if no one is trying to restrict my head canon, why do…

and what if I chose to believe frank is a ze/zem. Your argument falls apart then.

Lol you just admitted the devs already have a character whose gay in the lore, which one we don’t know. By definition this means that any of the relationships you point to as proof that heterosexual relationships are present might actually be not heterosexual. Then you say I am out of arguments. That is classic. I’ll…

The same creators who also said one current character is part of the gay community but won’t say who? Yeah, so I’ll keep my mind open to the character lore while you pigeon hole them.

So now you can tell me what the pronouns I want to use mean? See how ridiculous this gets? plus, once again I have no proof that heterosexual relationships are mentioned. If you choose to read the lore that way, you do you.

Your second line actually helps my point. Thank you.

You all have zero reading comprehension. It’s simple, if gender is fluid, then you cannot assume their relationships are heterosexual in nature. That means YOU are saying character x identifies a certain way. It’s a pretty big leap to make

You literally didn’t read a word I said. You just assumed they are all heterosexual

Someone else brought up a good point in that how do we know nurse isn’t bisexual? I think everyone here is a bigot for assuming frank doesn’t identify as a woman and you are just foisting the identity of male on him.

I’m sure you are all for this unless a “marginalized” group says something you don’t like.

“uhm. So heterosexuality in the game is okay but anything non-heterosexual should be left out because players can change their naming tag or have head canon” Question definitely has a motive questioning time to it but sure continue with it.

Trying to find a place where he said gays shouldn’t be allowed. Couldn’t find it. His argument said let people put their own mark on it and even included Jews as an example. You instead tried to imply he’s a homophobe against adding an openly gay character. You missed his point entirely

I tried making this point months ago in a different thread about this tired topic. Didn’t get an honest response. I’m not optimistic about your chances either.

First page bud you said, "About these guys and girls which use a certain violent language and behaviour just because they are unable to empathise." Sorry you don't remember what you said. But since you think language is violent, I guess I should use my words better.

Read the post from you which was quoted in my response. It's that simple.

Really, you thought that language was violent? I think I need surgery now my eyes rolled so hard. And while highly unlikely, maybe the guy was asking OP an honest question.

Huntress and it isn't close. She's more brutal and primal that he is. Plus he has what appears to be a bad leg, so he's at a physical disadvantage.

Thanks for being open minded

It was never there before

I completely agree. You would have a bunch of short Claudette in black hiding the whole match, then when they get hit cry it's not fair. No thanks, it is not needed here

Not to mention hitboxes would be even more weird if heights were changed

Seems a little unfair but you are right.

By saying they need more diversity, they are saying the numbers are not up to some imaginary minimum they have made up in their mind. If you don't see the problem with that, that's on you. It makes perfect sense for me to want the creative team to let their ideas flow instead of them looking at some chart on the wall and…

Sorry, I have no clue. I just felt bad cause you said no one could help you in the other forum and didn't want you feeling lonely

What people are saying is don't introduce a character in 3 months, fix the game first. And you say trying to avoid stereotypes is wrong, but I'm assuming you also think stereotypes themselves are wrong. So there is no winning then? Read what people said here already. The game is plenty diverse. Also, no one here is against…

I could be wrong; I don't want to speak for the OP. The way I read that line is they are saying black women in real life are the most hated group. If I am right, I didn't even want to address such an absurd claim