dooces

About

Username
dooces
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
33
Badges
4
Posts
27

Comments

  • survivors are subject to their teammates, killers will get to rank 1 just by playing. i dont know how to use smaller words or if you would like me to google translate to your native language ill be happy to do so, as you are missing the obvious. but you think contorted logic makes it otherwise - it doesnt.
  • i do just fine. sounds like you are mad that something isnt just given to you. 75% killer win rate. rank 1 - 4 killers have a 75% chance of pipping. how is that not a gimmie to rank 1? unless you are garbage and complain its not "balanced" because you expect it to be higher.
  • you think they were skewed by 25% somehow? that they cherry picked the worst case scenerio? survivors are subject to their teammates, so however bad they might be, however much they dc, that effects all other survivors in the game. however inaccurate you claim, or anyone claims them to be, they're representative, and they…
  • yes, because you believe as rank 1-4 killer somehow you are faced against mostly rank 5+ survivors. this is not the case. and considerably lower, statistics wise, would be 10%. not 50%. idk why you think they cherry picked the worse case scenario to publish, i argue they didnt.
  • again, you say nothing except you were told otherwise. you give no argument but dismiss mine.
  • so you are saying survivors are subject to their teammates, killers are not.
  • 75% is 75%, you cant write off 100% of the games to someone dcing or giving up. even if you are so ignorant thats what you propose, that still leaves the 3 survivors stuck in the game with a 66% chance to lose. anyway you want to contort the numbers or justify that statistic, you wont get that 75% down to 70, let alone 50.
  • explain to me why they should be taken with a grain of salt other than being told to do so? how have i used the stats out of context or what contortions have i made? dismissing data outright because you were told by the devs as they dont want to explain is foolish, i unless you have reasons to adduce otherwise, i will…
  • as most people will agree, rank means nothing. i dont bother instancing any discrepancy as i dont think there is one. if you play the game, you get rank 1, its not hard just putting time in. if you are still rank 10+ after 200 hours of game play, im sorry to say you are the outlier, and the stats dont reflect your games.…
  • amazing how killers think things are unbalanced when they dont win 80% of their games. try survivor, where your odds of escaping are 25%.
  • rank 3 with survivor. queue times are 1-2 mins. rank 9 killer after reset, queue times are 15-20 mins.
  • if you think killers need any kind of buff, i can see what level you are playing at.
  • i play killer a lot, queue times forbid me playing more. i win just by showing up. if you have a hard time playing killer, try not camping or tunneling.
  • sorry, but some people have to be below average, thats how we get averages.
  • oh, since they said not to, well then, who am i to hold their stats and make them justify it? much easier to just ask people to not pay attention. stats are stats. come up with any rhetoric you want, the stats say it all.
  • dont forget the swf, dont forget keys, dont forget everything you ######### about to give survivors that 25%. at the point stats demonstrably prove you wrong you should have the humility to keep quiet.
  • 75% killer win rate. whats with these killers complaining? would you be quiet at 80%? 95%? would that stop you from complaining?
  • 75% killer win rate. even considering swf, even high without. you want what, 80% killer win rate? 95% killer win rate? quit crying that 1 of 4 survivors make it out alive. if you cant do at least that you are well below average. get better.
  • 75 killer win rate. those who think its survivor sided are just the really bad killers who dont get wins handed to them. the others believe they're really good, just ######### about the 1 guy who gets away because survivors are op. 75% says it all.
  • 75% killer win rate, and you complain its not 95%? survivors are OP because 1 in 4 get away on average? if you cant win as killer you are way below average.
  • 75% killer win rate, and you want more buffs to what? take the survivors 25% down to 10%? 5%? talking about any killer needing a buff is hilarious.
  • 75% killer win rate, and preteen killers complain about them still having that 25%. you want people to stop dc'ing? give them more than a 25% chance to survive. moris go, keys stay.
Default Avatar