-
Re: It seems to me this new change INCENTIVIZES survivors to hold the game hostage (extreme hiding)
Hadn't thought the possibility of this being a measure against cheaters. I hope you're right about that part, but by the wording of both updates, it seems like a measure against holding the game host…1 -
Re: It seems to me this new change INCENTIVIZES survivors to hold the game hostage (extreme hiding)
Talk as much as you want, you are are still wrong according to definitions of the rules and the devs. You keep acting as if slugging is comparable to hiding to delay the game indefinitively, the poin…2 -
Re: It seems to me this new change INCENTIVIZES survivors to hold the game hostage (extreme hiding)
Well, it SHOULD be a killer win, but the word "surrender" implies the killer is the one losing, conceding the victory to the survivors. And the developer update just says it doesn't leave y…-2 -
Re: It seems to me this new change INCENTIVIZES survivors to hold the game hostage (extreme hiding)
Another one comparing apples to oranges. What you're describing is just BMing. Killers humping isn't much different from survivors T-bagging. It's more annoying when you're just on the ground and can…3 -
Re: It seems to me this new change INCENTIVIZES survivors to hold the game hostage (extreme hiding)
Camping, tunneling and slugging aren't ways of "trolling" nor "holding the game hostage", unlike extreme hiding, which is a bannable offense. So yeah, you ARE comparing apples to …6