Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.
Access the survey HERE!
Aesthetics outside maps.
I mean there's no trees behind the wall (outside map) and it just looks like map is floating. I think that outside the maps should be although couple tress. It'll look a lot better.
Comments
-
I think there are bigger issues for the devs to focus on, right now.
0 -
Could be a nice little QOL change for higher graphics settings. I would steer clear of it on lower presets just so people will lower end hardware don't get a framerate hit just for some trees outside the map. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to do, just plop some trees randomly outside, stick a couple static 2D images in the background far enough that you can't tell the difference.
Though like @ShrimpTwiggs said, I would put this way down on the priority list. Gameplay-wise it would have no effect, but it'd still be nice to have one day nonetheless.
0 -
Peanits said:
Could be a nice little QOL change for higher graphics settings. I would steer clear of it on lower presets just so people will lower end hardware don't get a framerate hit just for some trees outside the map. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to do, just plop some trees randomly outside, stick a couple static 2D images in the background far enough that you can't tell the difference.
Though like @ShrimpTwiggs said, I would put this way down on the priority list. Gameplay-wise it would have no effect, but it'd still be nice to have one day nonetheless.
0 -
@Nickenzie said:
Peanits said:Could be a nice little QOL change for higher graphics settings. I would steer clear of it on lower presets just so people will lower end hardware don't get a framerate hit just for some trees outside the map. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to do, just plop some trees randomly outside, stick a couple static 2D images in the background far enough that you can't tell the difference.
Though like @ShrimpTwiggs said, I would put this way down on the priority list. Gameplay-wise it would have no effect, but it'd still be nice to have one day nonetheless.
Kinda off-topic but @Peanits WHAT HAPPENED TO YOUR KATE DENISON PROFILE PICTURE?
I changed it. I started to feel bad for teasing people with it.
EDIT: Okay, not really, but the original joke was lost for the people who didn't see it, and it would instead just confuse people and make them wonder, "Weird, I don't see Kate on here, how did he get a Kate profile picture?"
1 -
@Peanits said:
@Nickenzie said:
Peanits said:Could be a nice little QOL change for higher graphics settings. I would steer clear of it on lower presets just so people will lower end hardware don't get a framerate hit just for some trees outside the map. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to do, just plop some trees randomly outside, stick a couple static 2D images in the background far enough that you can't tell the difference.
Though like @ShrimpTwiggs said, I would put this way down on the priority list. Gameplay-wise it would have no effect, but it'd still be nice to have one day nonetheless.
Kinda off-topic but @Peanits WHAT HAPPENED TO YOUR KATE DENISON PROFILE PICTURE?
I changed it. I started to feel bad for teasing people with it.
Looks at new profile pic
I'm not complaining.0