IWasThereOnce

In this same vain, I play on console where my account is the primary main account. My husband has a secondary account linked. My game works fine, crashes once in a blue moon, his has gotten 24 hour bans because the game won't stop crashing. Same internet, playing at same times of day, same console, everything is the same…

Whenever I play killer, it seems like the people who do that typically go down pretty fast for no real reason. I tend to save the tbagging for when I'm purposely taunting them enough to keep their eyes on me so people can be saved in basement or we can get the last gen done.

With survivor: Looping efficiently. I can run a killer, but I can't typically keep them at a loop for any extended amount of time. With killer: Huntress on console. Need I say more?

FOR THE LOW COST OF $9000 I CAN TOO PREDICT YOUR FUTURE.

Actually, I wasn't defending them at all, I was saying that the balance is un-fair. I support a penalty for camping, and, as long as there is one, I support infinite bans. And by "points" you claim I ignored... are you referencing the "devs are god and no one should question them" points? Because those were ######### points.

And now killers are abusing people and forcing them to de-pip, but that's okay, because it benefits you, lmfao. There is a way to do it, the devs could easily stop being lazy.

Fair point,

Only really that one dev's tweet is strong enough for me, if i'm being completely honest. Other than that, I havent seen strong hints to point to anything. I wouldn't be upset by candyman, I would just be like "you said iconic and this is not iconic", lol.

I heard Jason is hard to get, and unlikely they will. Pennywise I would definitely be down for, although I don't know if they'd go for two clowns,

If it is, they've got a weird definition of "iconic", lol.

A lot of people closer to it all flat out stated that it's not candyman, plus, I would hardly call him iconic in horror.

Lol, I can agree there.

Apparently Scott Jund was streaming and my husband said something like "I hope it's Pyramid head, although I think it would be virtually impossible cause his sword is far too big and heavy, you'd screw up the hit pretty easily." And he replied "I think it'll be fine." Which he took as confirmation because we're both team…

I've gotten a whole 3 or 4k and made barely any more than people are making for face camping. This is an issue.

I can agree with this. If suiciding, they shouldn't get a safety pip, but if they don't wanna have a penalty for face camping, they absolutely need to compensate with a safety pip.

People criticize writers for ######### things in books and ######### things in movies, this is no difference. Your entire "devs are god" complex needs to be worked out, because gaming is a competitive community, and one where games die pretty drastically when they're poorly balanced-- of which, the players are commenting about.…

This. I'm not even against camping in a sense that you're in the same area. Even if I can still see you, fine, but when you are trying to morph your body into the hooked survivor you're still close, there needs to be a much harsher penalty. These people shouldn't be in red/purple ranks, *at the very least.*

oof, except, not other survivors either, because the unskilled killer who is somehow magically still in red/purple ranks despite not making the game fun for anyone is making sure of that. Either put infinite loops on everything, or penalize face camping far more harsh. I shouldn't be in red ranks getting matched with…

They aren't comparable, because a hooked survivor has no options, but a killer chasing a looper has several, lmfao. What's next? Demand every survivor begin without legs? Make it real easy on you?

Survivor*

You're right, they're not the same. A person being camped has literally no options, while the killer being looped can either go find a different killer and leave them alone, or stay there until they move, or get killed by the entity for not finding hatch or a door and looping past time time. Absolutely not comparable.

I mean, survivors already get blocked for looping and yet killers don't get anything for hook fetishes, so I mean, the game already isn't fair.

Except the fact that people playing the game and continue to play the game are allowed to give constructive criticism, which is what I'm doing. I don't want to hear a single tear from bullshit killers who cry about looping and agree that face-camping is "legitimate". They can make the games all they want, but if it fails,…

Even a "face camped" achievement similar to the extra disconnection points that killers get.

Okay, then they need to disable the penalty for survivors vaulting the same window over and over again. :) It's a valid play style. They could always just go to someone else and get all of them down, so there doesn't need to be a penalty for abusing a loop.

Is it a valid play style? Because, I mean, I don't face camp and still average 3 or so kills per game, as do any other actually skilled players. The fun of the game is to be chased by killers as a survivor, and the fun of a killer is to chase the survivors. You're literally taking away all that when you're straight up hard…

Sorry, you're totally right, lemme rephrase. There needs to be a better system that discourages it entirely so people actually stop playing like this. Losing two pips every single game you camp would be ideal,

I had something similar happen a few days ago. I got stuck in the middle of the unbroken palette after a stun, I was completely unable to move the rest of the game.

You can purchase cosmetics for a character before buying said character, but you won't be able to use them until after you have bought the character. So no, it doesn’t unlock it.