frozzenk

You are not even realizing that from the get go your entire argument is based on the assumption that the killer doing their objective is "bm". Tunneling, camping, aggressive slugging. As you called it. These are all tools that can be implemented in order to fulfill the killer's objective. Which is to kill. If the name…

Well it wouldn't. Anything survivors are given they just abuse. Survivors body blocking out of the hook abusing the immunity they get is not new by now. Mind you I don't even think this is a bad play from the survivor. They are abusing something that was supposed to make it so they aren't tunneled immediately off the hook…

You disagree that survivors wanting to do their objective but being upset when killers do theirs constitutes hypocrisy, which means you think it is justified. Thinking a mentality that is clearly unbalanced and biased like that is justified constitutes entitlement. You seem very confused, sort of folding under your own…

Disagreeing about it means that you think survivors should do their objectives without any checks while killers should have to follow several arbitrary rules when completing theirs. That is, by definition (if you are going to be upset by what I'm about to say, please be upset at the English language, not at me)…

It makes sense because people are hypocrites. I already said this 3 times. Survivors are fine doing their objective, regardless of what the killer may think. They are not fine with the same thing from the other side. At this point I think there might be some language issue here if you cannot comprehend the hypocrisy. It is…

It's not just that. The game is accumulating reason on top of reason for killers to stop hooking. I stopped playing survivor because of it. Any single reason alone might not be enough, but when you add everything up, hooking is just a bad idea for killers. When you just keep mindlessly nerfing and hurting hooks over and…

Please, stop being disingenuous repeatedly. Survivors do a lot more policing on killers doing their objective than the other way around. You know this, I don't understand why do you act as if you didn't. You see a killer here and there complaining about gen rushing every once in a while, but compare that to how often you…

Were you obtuse on purpose? The question is why is everything ok and nothing matters when it comes to survivors doing their objective, but when it comes to killers doing theirs, suddenly a bunch of factors show up. Hopefully you understood the point now, though I suspect you understood it the first time and just pretended…

I typed "leeeeeoooon" once in chat (resident evil 4 flashbacks) and that was censored. I typed "ty" once in chat and that was censored. This chat filter is crazy. And yes, adults should not be weaker than children. They should be able to take words. But even if you insult your playerbase by assuming they are adults made of…

Why is it ok for survivors to do their objective but when killers do theirs suddenly the "community" makes up a bunch of rules and fun suddenly becomes a factor? Suddenly playing the objective becomes "toxic". What do you call this phenomenon? Other than massive hypocrisy, that is.

Match result? What? Are you trying to compete on some invisible leader board or something? Your gymnastics to try to paint a killer killing as "not a kill" are amazing. Do words mean different things where you come from? Or is this an issue with English proficiency (or lack thereof)? You're the killer. You kill. A killer…

Daily rituals? What? I'm amazed people who care about that exist. Adept achievements? You do that once, big deal. Are those really your arguments? Here's mine: You're the killer. You kill. The end.

That's what the hatch does. It rewards the losing team with an almost 50/50. Survivors can get absolutely stomped but the last guy standing will have a rough coin toss chance of "winning". Participation medals come to mind. It's nonsensical of course, but sadly necessary because otherwise people would grief the match…

That positive is very debatable, though I'm not sure if you're allowed to say you don't think she is cool without people attacking you and trying to cancel you.

I think some people, for some unknown reason, have a difficulty understanding the difference between slugging someone just to leave them there for no reason when you could hook them with no downsides (such as letting people bleed out when all 4 survivors are slugged and they could finish the game by hooking but they…

I mean I get that it's part of online environments and parents who failed miserably at educating their children due to either incompetency or just not loving them, so cheaters will always exist. What is inexcusable is that BHVR is not strict on the punishment. One offense and it should be a hardware ban. Period. Instead…

Are you guys raiding the forum or something? I've never seen a post about the middle east situation and today there's like 6 or 7 of them near the top, and I'm not even exaggerating.

Wait there's a free weekend right now?

People who want them to systematically statt adding bots are absolutely delusional and would kill any online game they worked for. Reminds me of some clowns advocating for bhvr to remove the leaver penalty back when they added bots on dc. Obviously didnt happen but if you were here then youll remember those clown posts.…

Why is a complete rework so off the table? Something like making her unable to 360 for instance would probably not really hurt the 4k hours nurse player, and just make her even worse for beginners. So end of the day the issue is still there, aka the skilled nurse players are still going to stomp the life out of everyone.…

Okay so let me see if I understand the nurse defenders right: They acknowledge nurse is strong, likely THE strongest. But since you cannot tap into that realm unless you are skilled then it is okay and should stay as it is. And everyone who is unlucky enough to find themselves against a skilled nurse should just accept…

You didn't deny she was strong but your whole passive aggressive narrative of "skill issue???" implying it's me when you are aware that everyone and their mothers rank Nurse at the top, but conveniently chose to forget so you could be passive aggressive. That's what makes you disingenuous.

You're just being disingenuous. Go watch any tier list or whatever on youtube that is using strength as a metric (as opposed to fun or whatever other metric). You know she is at the top 1 or 2 (mostly 1) for every single one of those. I don't know why you're arguing as if that's just me. Just disingenuous man. Why?

What do you mean far from OP? Do we play the same game? She is top 1 most powerful killer in pretty much everyone's list.

It's hard to understand the hypocrisy of asking people to not do something that is effective yet understandably unpleasant, so you can then wait for them and t-bag at the hatch. Can you explain that?

Sadako has no chase power. Unless she is running an iridescent addon which is obviously expensive, you can do tape runs that consist of like 5 steps. You can also just keep a tape on your person to protect against stacking. She has to walk up to you and hit you if you have a tape because she has no chase power. Hell, even…

It's funny how there are so many people who prefer to spend their time complaining instead of learning the counter. You'd be surprised how many times I do a teleport a little bit into the game and then have like 3 heartbeats happening together. Not a single person bothered to do the counter. And then you go in the forum…

There is one, you are just uncapable of doing it, judging by your "she just spam teleport to build condemned and easily mori you" report. Don't blame the game for your own shortcomings. Read my previous post if you are lost somehow.

I hate them honestly. Pyramid Head's is awful.

Literally all you have to do is pick up a tape. Lord almighty, why is this so hard? This gives you an aegis shield against her condemn unless she physically hits you. She has no chase power. Don't be awful at looping. Get into a locker if necessary. This counters her hitting tape.

Of course there are reasons to still slug. Think of this: Hooking doesn't further condemn. Teleporting and hitting does. You just downed someone and other survivors are currently holding tapes. The time you're spending walking someone to a hook is time you could spend hitting someone else and making sure tapes aren't free…

So you're saying that grabbing *should* be worse than a hit that was already guaranteed anyway for Sadako because by grabbing you avoid a potential flashlight save? That's better than the other guy at least. He was refusing to read at all. Do you honestly feel like Sadako of all killers needed to have something specific to…

You were going to hook them regardlesss. They are already wounded and about to get hit. Knowing that a grab is worse for Sadako than a regular hit, and knowing that they are going down anyway, the survivor then enters a locker. "Oh but Sadako gets a hook!" is an irrelevant argument because they were already going to get…

Lord almighty, the effort to fanboy is strong. You were already going to hit them regardless. You were already going to wound them regardless. They enter a locker to avoid the hit and force Sadako to grab them, knowing that it's worse for her. You don't like the punished word and will use that to avoid actually building an…

You don't understand. If you're chasing a wounded survivor and they know they're going to get hit they can just enter a locker. Sadako is punished for grabbing instead of hitting them down. She will not build stacks. When she hooks him, it will not build stacks. And to top it off, the tape they are carrying is destroyed.…

It's comical how tapes can now just be picked up and delivered 5 steps later to the nearest TV and the way to fix this is to use an iridescent addon. This just baffles me. To people who are defending her rework (for some unknown reason, fanboyism maybe?) I'd honestly like to see your argument to defend this. While you're…

Almost never saw Sadako. Now, once the initial rush of people trying to see her new rework passes, I'll probably NEVER see Sadako. They did her dirty. Apparently seeing one Sadako in a month was too much for BHVR. They wanted less.

BHVR has already said they aren't removing DC penalty. This is an online game. You are (hopefully) a person and you are playing against other people. The intent is for this to continue being an online game. Stop trying to turn this into a bot game, what's wrong with you? Bots are just the very last resort. The solution to…

I mentioned your strawman and specifically addressed it, and again you come at me with "put all of our focus on punishing people for not doing the right thing". That's crazy. Let me say this again then: Does that need to be the only measure ever taken? Of course not, and I suspect that was your strawman. But ultimately, if…

I don't know if you live in an alternative universe but modern society and most counties' (if not all?) law systems use "negative reinforcement". People go to jail. Sometimes they get executed, even. People who do wrong things should always be punished in some way or another. Does that need to be the only measure ever…

I don't really understand the mentality of "someone did a ######### thing to me because they are a ######### person, I will now become them". Whatever happened to just staying superior? When you do something scummy like DC'ing from a match on purpose you are on the same level of people who do all other scummy things like letting…

The progressing increase in penalty for multiple dc's should be considerably harsher. Massively harsher, even. Don't like it? Don't be a scummy person who clicks the play button and then quits just because you don't like something that happened. There is no excuse. Whenever you willingly quit a match it's not the game's…

I understand you're frustrated but I really wish people like this would actually stop to think on what they are saying. In your scenario, the killer has half of the team hooked in the same room. At least half of the remaining half is guaranteed to be coming there out of their own volition. So *at least* 3/4 of the survivor…