The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

Can We Please Get a "Bleed Out" Option

I'm am so very tired of being left to bleed out on the ground while the Killer slugs the whole team or if it's just me and one other person. I just wish I could "bleed out" while left on the ground that way at least the other Survivor would have the chance to get Hatch or and I can move on to the next game.

Comments

  • Jay_Whyask
    Jay_Whyask Member Posts: 601

    The simplest solution is the best

    Survivors can stand up after being slugged for 1 minute.

    They also receives 10 seconds of haste & endurance.

    This ability would probably be disabled during the end game collapse like the anti-facecamp thing

  • Vishlumbra
    Vishlumbra Member Posts: 200

    Almost, they can TRY to stand up with the risk of dying, just like hooks, 4% chance.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436
    edited November 22

    I lowkey support this idea on both sides. As Surv there is nothing worse than when I am downed as one of the last two, then the Killer cannot find me so I bleed out. As Killer, I hate losing slugs too, it's legitimately my nightmare scenario and it's happened way too many times. I'm a pretty nice Killer - I still like to give hatch even with the basekit Mori and I'm just not into slugging for anything more than quick pressure. Sometimes, I will down one of the two at the end then kill the other, but give the first person downed the Hatch as a sort of "sorry about that long slug but I wanted your friend more than you, here's the hatch/gate for your trouble". I actually don't enjoy slugging unless I absolutely need it for pressure, I WANT to spread my hooks due to my build and I hate it if I have to leave someone slugged and then they crawl away and I cannot find them, so we both waste 4 minutes at the end.

    I would support this idea for the louder noises and faster bleedout alone, but the basekit Tenacity, being able to use keys, and being able to swap items is nice. Though I do think with this change, Tenacity itself would need something else - perhaps it reveals where exits and the hatch or chests or something like that are if you're Death Hook, Wounded, or last Survivor?

  • sockposs
    sockposs Unconfirmed, Member Posts: 3

    Ugh I absolutely hate losing slugs, I always feel so bad. alternatively there's also people that will hide intentionally while slugged when there's no chance anyone will get them up and after there's any benefit to waste the killers time. im not a big fan of these people, its comparable to intentionally bleeding a survivor out on the killer side.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    I'm also sick of people who grief this way, wasting everyone's time. Like, you're dead on the ground, your friends are dead, you lost, please just let me end the round so we can all move on. I always crawl under a hook if I end up the slug in this situation, or at least crawl into an open area. I really don't wanna bleed out any more than I want YOU to sit there for four minutes and bleed out.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 356

    I'll slug for the 3k like that if a survivor sells out their teammates. Slug gets hatch, but that betrayal isn't going unpunished!

  • vladspellbinder
    vladspellbinder Member Posts: 332

    The only thing I do not agree with here is opening up chests while slugged. I get the idea behind it but think it'd be a little bit wonky. If the chest is already open then, yeah, swap items but if the chest is still locked you can't wiggle the lock to get it open.

    Base-kit Unbreakable but better! No thanks. Base-kit Unbreakable was pushed hard against for a reason. Even just having one per trial for every Survivor is really strong and makes slugging as a stalling tactic not as viable. Sure they'll be down for a bit but a well timed Unbreakable is really strong and can punish a greedy slug. With it base-kit slugging wouldn't be a thing at all and that's not my goal. I agree that slugging is a needed part of the game and it has it's place in the meta, I just don't want turboslugs and second-to=last slugs to not waste as much time as they do.

    Always annoying to lose that one slug you dropped because their other teammate was trying for a blind slash hook block instead of doing a gen or hiding so of course you go after them for that hook. I, too, want to give Hatch most time and I can't really do that if they crawl off into a corner to bleed out out of spite to "deny" me that hook.

    As for Tenacity it could just stay mostly the same, allowing you to be a FAST slug if you're "Desperate". Maybe lower the volume of Grunts of Pain to 50% so it cancels out while Desperate but otherwise keep it the same. Borrowed Time only got changed to increase the base-kit time so Tenacity doesn't need much of a touchup.

  • UndeddJester
    UndeddJester Member Posts: 3,393
    edited November 22

    I must apologise gents, but I am one of those people who slugs away… legit Tenacity is my favourite perk in the game because I just find it hilarious crawling off, looking back and seeing the killer searching for me in the distance 🤣

    In fairness, while I will admit to a certain amount of spite, the real reason I do it is because I operate on a principle of "it ain't over 'til it's over". I crawl away, because I'm trying to give myself a chance at hatch... and while it is rare, I have actually managed to escape crawling through gate and and hatch this way on occasion. 😁

    However if the killer finds it first, then it's more a case of, damn... oh well... now it's a game of hide and seek. Really it's just a case of keeping myself amused while I bleed out. You're 0.7 while crawling, so if you have crawled away for hatch, it's not like you can really react to wherever killer is and make noise for them to find you anyway. It'll take me just as much time to crawl back into the open, and the killer still needs to step over me to find me, unless the killer actually looks at you, it can be just as hard to be found as it is to stay hidden xD

    So to my mind, mightvas well just try to keep hidden, means I still get nervous when the killer comes near, so its still some fun if you treat successfully bleeding out as a new objective 😅

    To be fair, if the killer finds me/has me dead to rights, I will not resist and let them put me somewhere cool for the Mori 😁

  • UndeddJester
    UndeddJester Member Posts: 3,393

    The only thing I do not agree with here is opening up chests while slugged. I get the idea behind it but think it'd be a little bit wonky. If the chest is already open then, yeah, swap items but if the chest is still locked you can't wiggle the lock to get it open.

    Fair.

    I suppose with chests generally being given more appealing perks, and there is a sort of idea of "if you're down to 2 players, start opening chests to try and get a key".

  • Vishlumbra
    Vishlumbra Member Posts: 200

    Let’s summarize every request survivors have:

    “Killers should exist to provide me with entertainment only, never to win, much less kill anyone”

  • Blueberry
    Blueberry Member Posts: 13,671

    Fundamentally disagree.

    It is intended mechanic not circumventing.

    Slugging does require skill, you had to outplay them to down in the first place. It also does not guarantee a 4K, just inaccurate. I’d also disagree about only earning a 3k. If you are getting hatch you don’t earn anything. If a hatch is used to escape it was an earned 4K. Hatch is an unearned free escape for no reason.

  • buggybug
    buggybug Member Posts: 365
    edited November 22

    Dear survivors please do not complain about the hook respawn mechanic. With this we will no longer have to slug and can hook you normally. Of course I knew it was a load of,

  • Lixadonna
    Lixadonna Member Posts: 256

    Never going to happen in an immensely Killer Sided game.

  • JPLongstreet
    JPLongstreet Member Posts: 5,894

    Funny how the hatch mechanic leads to all of this. I do like the notion of a slug recovering fully then taking chances to get up into injured status. Something like the 4% unhook odds seems appropriate, and each failure to get up quickens the bleed out.

    We can play around with the particular numbers, have it only activate when just two survs are left maybe. Worth testing out imo.

  • Lixadonna
    Lixadonna Member Posts: 256

    Those slugging for the 4Kill are also the ones who QQ about bully and SWF. They don't realize trying so hard to win leads them to the bullies and SWF.

  • buggybug
    buggybug Member Posts: 365
    edited November 22

    I lost count on how many times I said this same thing my friend. Like really they treat solo q players like garbage but when a swf or even a non swf but a competent set of survivors give them karma from what they do solo q. They boohoo claiming bullies, survivor op, perk need nerf etch.

    Post edited by buggybug on
  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436
    edited November 22

    "Only earned a 3k"

    LMAO a 3k is still a win. That's a Killer win, you already earned a win. There's no "only" about it, YOU WON. Slugging for a 4k is kinda lame, unless they brought the sweaty/bully energy first. Then it's pretty valid.

  • Seraphor
    Seraphor Member Posts: 9,423

    Yes I agree. It's still not a 4K though.

    If there is to be any meaningful distinction between a 3K and a 4K, then there should be a meaningful amount of effort to obtain it, just like escaping.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    But I mean there really isn't that much distinction though, a win is a win is a win. But I do see your point, the effort is there - it's in finding and downing and killing that last Survivor. That's not negligible.

  • vladspellbinder
    vladspellbinder Member Posts: 332

    As I've said I'm a Killer Main, over three-fourths my games are on the Killer side. The reason for this is that for me playing Survivor sucks and I want the experience to be better and more fun. I WANT Killers to get 4ks, but I want them to do it via twelve hooks (or eleven and a Mori now I guess). I do not want to see 4ks done via slugging all four Survivors for the entire game (this has happened to me once more already since posting this thread by the way; Vigo's Journal and Compound Thirty-Three are one hell of a combo it seems) nor do I want 4ks because they slugged the second to last person to prevent Hatch from spawning (happened to me TWICE more after having posted this thread, both times as the slug).

    I want BOTH sides to have a fun time. You trying to make this reductive down to "Stop having fun guys." is not helpful and actively detrimental to things. Stuff can be changed to make it slightly more fair and fun for one side over the other while not totally removing the fun from that other side. The changes made for base-kit Borrowed Time and the anti-camp have proved that these sorts of problems can be addressed in ways that are fair for both Killer and Survivor. Will they force people to change how they play? Yes, of course, but that shouldn't stop the changes being made because that playstyle needs to change to make things more fun overall.

    What "side" the game on is never going to be agreed on. However, you say this and we got base-kit Borrowed Time "in a Killer sided game". We got an anti-camp feature "in a Killer sided game". We got gen regression caps "in a Killer sided game". There have also been a lot of changes for the Killer side "in a Survivor sided game", such as various add-on and Perk nerfs.

    The game is sided to whatever side you don't play the most. That's just bias. Doesn't make it true.

    Slugging should be one of the next 'problems' on the "The List Of Solo Queue Survivor Fixes That Need To Be Made" so hopefully we'll get something other than base-kit Unbreakable soon. Really just being able to bleed-out faster is all that is needed.

    I've seen more than a handful of streamers who "pay it forward" in that if they get a toxic group of Survivors as Killer they then play super toxic to the next group. Like, really people? You're just being part of the problem here!

    There is some distinction between a 3K and a 4K: when it comes to achievements. If you're going for a Killer Adept you need to get that 4k. This is the only scenario where my bitterness over seeing a third Survivor slugged to find the forth is somewhat mollified. Still sucks as it's happening but I somewhat understand.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    I think if the only real distinction between a 3k and a 4k is cheevos, then there's arguably little difference between a 3k and a 4k at all. One's just a "you win with style" option while the other is simply "you win". I really truly wish that BHVR would just adjust the Adepts to not HAVE to be 4ks, it seems like it should just be "win as X Killer with their own perks". That would eliminate stuff like slugging and stuff for adepts.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 356

    Agreed about adepts being a problem in that sense.

    I always thought that doing something with style meant holding the door open for someone less fortunate ;)

    And while I mostly meant that as a joke about giving hatch, I kind of treat it that way when I play killer. If the last survivor didn't do anything to deliberately aggro me, they're probably getting hatch.

    Having said that, I think it's important to go for 4k sometimes so that there's always an expectation that as the last survivor, you're generally not going to make it. That threat makes giving hatch feel more meaningful in my mind. But now having said all this, I think slugging for 4k is the opposite of winning with style. It's more like a hunter with a weapon hunting a defenseless creature that doesn't even know how to fight back, and then the hunter decides to take away the only means of escape. No sport in it.

    Anyway, now I feel like I'm ranting. I think I agree with what you wrote :D

  • vladspellbinder
    vladspellbinder Member Posts: 332

    Fully agree that Killer Adept should be decoupled from "Merciless Killer" and should instead require something like ten or eleven hook states (because sometimes someone just goes second hook from first because of bad teammates), to give the possibility of letting the last one go slash taking the Mori. As it is right now if you Mori someone you don't even get Merciless because it's tied to sacrifices not kills. Some people will tunnel to get it but people already tunnel to get Killer Adepts anyways so no real change there.

    I also agree that there isn't any real difference in a 3K and a 4K for me most games. Some games I really want to catch everyone because of how well they were playing and want to prove to myself I'm "good enough" but most matches I am perfectly content with getting a 3K and a "If I can find the last one great if not that's fine as well." but some people have gotten it into their heads that it's "4K or nothing" so they must get all four kills. I think the big name Killer streamers are somewhat to blame for this and need to change how they play. Stop doing challenges that "require" them to play super sweaty or maybe change the rules of said challenges so they don't have to tunnel people out at five gens in order to beat said challenge.

  • vBlossom_
    vBlossom_ Member Posts: 459

    I think hatch should be spawned when last survivor is downed by the killer, because right now due to whole this situation with slugging hatch is useless.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 356

    Actually, this is a really good idea. So if the third survivor goes down or is eliminated, hatch opens. Then slugging for 4k might be completely eliminated.

  • vBlossom_
    vBlossom_ Member Posts: 459

    I also think that this whole "Bleed out"/ "Concede" option would be highly exploited by the killers - they would play as nasty as possible and slug even more, because such options would give even easier 4ks.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 356

    Understood. I was agreeing with your suggestion! If hatch spawns as soon as the third survivor is eliminated or slugged, then slugging for 4k to prevent hatch would be completely eliminated.

    I think it would need some caveats though. Killers need to be incentivised to put the third survivor on hook and play the remaining game as normal. If hatch opens immediately upon the third survivor being slugged, the killer's best play would be to slug the third and immediately go hunt for hatch and/or the fourth survivor.

    I'd say that if the third survivor is slugged for more than 15 seconds without being picked up and no other survivor being in chase, then hatch could open. That would mean slugging for 4k would be likely to give the last survivor hatch race, and the slugged survivor could even be able to crawl to it, triggering egc. That might be enough to make killers prefer to camp the hook of the third survivor, which is almost an expected play. That gives options to the last survivor, whereas in a slug for 4k, the last survivor only has nearly hopeless options: hide for several minutes or pick up the slug so the killer can do it again.

  • vladspellbinder
    vladspellbinder Member Posts: 332

    I've said over, and over again NO. Base-kit Unbreakable is TOO STRONG and was shot down when the developers themselves proposed it for good reason. Base-kit Unbreakable would make slugging a really bad option, even if you only restricted it to once per Survivor. The goal isn't to remove slugging, it is to make slugging more bearable for the Survivor being slugged and to limit "slug the second to last to find the last" game extension. Being able to bleed out faster on demand is a good middle ground that doesn't help the Survivor win but allows them to move on to the next game faster.

    Good luck actually coding such a thing. It has too many "What-ifs" and operant conditions. Does the Hatch despawn if the slug is picked up in some manner? Does the Hatch close and lock and trigger end game collapse if one of the Survivors goes through it, trapping the other? Does it stay open to potentially allow both out?

    If the Hatch spawns right next to the slug and the Killer closes it we've got E.G.C. happening so that'd be something at least.

    It's a nice idea in theory but in practice it'd probably be too finicky.

    Killers are already four person slugging, so not much would change. If what makes a person going from playing how they currently play to full team slugging or slugging second-to-last is that the Survivors are no longer as inconvenienced as before that's still a win for the Survivor not being as inconvenienced.

    We'd probably see less four person slugging over all, because I've asked people why they do it and the general response was one of two things; either "To shut down most of Survivor Perks I see most often" or "To waste as much of your time as possible and make your experience as ######### as I can".

    Some people be spiteful little witches with a b. These later people where typically upset when people disconnected because while they'd be locked out of next game for a bit they were not in the current game suffering on the ground. That was back when I used to not have cross-play on and could still get games and actually use end game chat but it seems things haven't changed much in the "Every so often you get a really nasty match" but I have seen a larger increase in second-to-last slugging, especially for a Mori, than before.

    Speaking of for second-to-last slugging, I would expect it to not change much, since the way I could see the "Bleed Out" actually being implemented would still give more time to find the last Survivor over hooking someone.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 356

    That shouldn't be so hard to code. My suspicion is that when an in-game event (e.g. survivor is hooked, killer misses a swing, survivor is slugged) occurs, a sequence of 'if' statements are checked in the code. All that should need to happen is to put an if that triggers when a survivor is slugged and two survivors are already sacrificed. If that condition is met, start a timer for 15 seconds, at the end of which another check is made that opens the hatch if the third survivor is not hooked and no chase is active.

    Hatch can just remain open at that point, enabling the start of hatch race, which can be won by either the slug, the last survivor standing, or the killer. As soon as a survivor enters hatch or killer closes it, lock hatch and trigger egc. In this scenario, hatch race isn't circumvented by slugging for 4k, and the killer then has to worry about either the slug or last survivor getting it. I'd actually go a step further and give the slug basekit Left Behind for as long as they remain slugged so that the killer is heavily disincentived to slug the third survivor.

    Since egc triggers as soon as anyone closes hatch (by killer closing it or one survivor escaping), the game can only become a four minute hide and seek match if the killer slugs for 4k and downs the last survivor.

    The killer could go look for hatch upon downing the third survivor and hope to trigger egc, but then they risk the slug being picked up and both survivors escaping. They could also camp the slug, but then the hatch is likely to be taken by the fourth survivor. The best play seems to be to be to put the third on hook and start hatch race. I'm not seeing too many ways how it would be hard to code or lead to weird plays.

  • vladspellbinder
    vladspellbinder Member Posts: 332

    I was mostly making a "spaghetti code" joke about it Changing it from "Three (Killed OR Sacrificed) Survivors" to "Two (Killed OR Sacrificed) one (Dying)" shouldn't be too hard. It just comes down to if the devs are willing to make more Hatch changes after they changed it from "Gen math" to "Last alive".

    I'm all for built in Left Behind for the slug though. Maybe then Left Behind itself can get changed into an actually useful Perk.

  • vladspellbinder
    vladspellbinder Member Posts: 332

    I was just slugged as second-to-last in 2v8 mode so the Killers could find A BOT as the last. Not even another player. A bot. Someone who had already DCed. They slugged me to find a [insert long string of profanity here] bot.

    I don't even know why I bothered coming back to this deities forsaken cesspit of a game.

  • Angerydoge
    Angerydoge Member Posts: 81

    Your argument literally doesn't make sense, the way you put it, if the 2nd survivor presses a button to bleed out, it would just immediately result in a hatch race, in the scenario that survivors can pick themselves up it, provided that the killer doesn't want this to happen, they just hook the 2nd survivor and they die, still resulting in a hatch race. The only difference is that people can actually play the game if they can pick themselves up.

    Furthermore this removes the 4 man slug which is an issue that needs to be fixed.

  • Reinami
    Reinami Member Posts: 5,546
    edited 3:11AM

    We shouldn't be giving more ways for survivors to give up. We should be eliminating ways for survivors to do that and punishing them for doing so.

    THEN, we need to stop punishing killers for hooking survivors, and start encouraging them to go for hooks, rather than for kills.

  • Reinami
    Reinami Member Posts: 5,546

    The problem is the hatch mechanic itself. In order to secure the 4k without slugging the killer has to:

    • Already "Win the match" by not having the survivors escape
    • Find the hatch before the survivor
    • Find the survivor before they can open the gate.

    The killer has to "win" 3 times to get the 4k, whereas the 4th survivor only has to "win" once.

    A BETTER mechanic that would showcase the skill on both sides, would be that, once the 3rd survivor dies on the hook, both the killer and the final survivor are teleported to a special zone, similar to ones they have done for the halloween event. This zone is the same layout every single time. The goal is the survivor needs to "survive" for some amount of time, lets say 1 minute. If they last for 1 minute, then they get to escape. If they get downed by the killer, then the killer automatically goes into the match ending mori.

  • vladspellbinder
    vladspellbinder Member Posts: 332

    Lets say that the last two Survivors get base-kit Unbreakable, they can each pick themselves up once as soon as two other Survivors are dead. The problem with this is that the Killer slugs the second-to-last knowing they will be able to get up but this still buys them more time to try and find the fourth then if they hooked that Survivor. They then just slug the forth to go and find the third again and now the third won't be able to get back up again once they are found and slugged again while the Killer goes back to hunting down the forth. Again. It's just making more slush time where the Survivors can't really progress the game.

    There are very few scenarios where being able to get back up from a slug as second-to-last actually means anything. Maybe if all gens are done and you almost got the gate open but are then slugged I can see it mattering that you can get back up again but that's about it.

    The reason I want a bleed-out option and not a base-kit Unbreakable option is to not cheapen Unbreakable itself and because base-kit Unbreakable is a very hard sell for most Killer players and it will very likely get a lot of push-back. It was shot down by the community when the devs tried to float the idea alongside the Finisher Mori. Yes that was for everyone but I don't think a "last two only" would fare much better. With a bleed-out the Killer plays still gets a death but if they need sacrifices, such as for Adept, then they'll have to hook and play Hatch game instead of being able to find and down and hook the fourth then come back for the slug for a Mori or a final hook.

    With base-kit Unbreakable more Killers would probably start running Knock Out which, ok, they're using one less gen slowdown but it's still another form of slowdown and isn't all that fun to play against so not something I'd want to see.

    How often do you play Survivor? Really? How often? Because I play infrequently and I really want there to be no disconnection penalty now that we have the bots, Just allow people to disconnect as they want with no timer lock on their next match, no lost progress on dailies and Archives. Maybe have it so they don't earn any Bloodpoints but allow them to keep everything else.

    Why? Because I see so many people killing themselves on first hook because they don't like the map or the Killer or whatever. If they Kobe they either just stand under the hook or run right up to the Killer to get hooked again and if saved do it again. If people can just disconnect if they don't want to play then the ones that do want to play will at least have the bot around and let me tell you, as a Killer main those bots are actually pretty good at looping. You can't mind game them, they don't pre-drop pallets, and their pathing is actually pretty descent. As a Survivor I'd rather have a bot on my team than a dead teammate and because people can't disconnect without a penalty they'd rather die then DC.

    Even with DC penalties in play I see people doing it when they're already dying for some reason. Those people I don't understand.

    But, yes, I don't believe in punishing people for wanting to leave a match they do not wish to play in.

    That's a lot of coding. Also, how many pallets are in this "deathmath realm"? Windows? Do the Killer and Survivor start facing each other like most 1v1s? What about Killer powers? Does Plague keep Corrupt Purge if she had it? Does Shape keep his T3 charge? Survivor Perks? Does Hope work? Mettle of Man?

    The idea in and of itself isn't a bad idea but it has a lot of issues that need to be worked out and it's a toss up on if it would actually showcase skill or not. Also, honestly, I don't think it is worth the effort it would take to code at this point with The Hatch already in the game. Maybe if this had been done instead of Hatch but we have Hatch and should work with Hatch.

  • warp1die
    warp1die Member Posts: 437

    As someone who has gone into the slug meta, I can say this with full responsibility. You would sell me the Bleed Out changes rather than the basic Unbreakable set.

    I see Unbreakable as an extension of your 4 minute agony. You will get up and fall until someone finally dies. The killer side has enough patience in long games. Skull Merchant chess players are proof of this.

    Purely tactically, this would help me when playing 4 survivor slug, since you would be hurting the other three survivors.

    Although maybe the killers need a perk that will reduce the 4 minute timer with each hit? By 20-40 seconds.