LexTalionis

I'd touch the rest of what you said if it wasn't an incoherent rant. I picked out something direct and obvious. I'm also not a killer main, I play both sides, at red ranks, thanks. Do you play killer at red ranks?

Yes, and not only that, any killer power, perk, or addon that gives you some form of Oblivious is now invalid and worthless with respect to BT. This is a giant buff for BT and nerf to every Oblivious element of the game, and it is frankly pathetic balancing. Probably going to invest my time in Home Sweet Home now, I'm…

I love having it there - occasionally get the salty person in chat, but have met far more good people because of it than bad.

Queue times were only bad (and are still only bad) for survivors. Gee, I wonder why. Because of people like the OP who are constantly calling for killers to be worse and worse and less desirable to play for a majority of the playerbase.

Is this some brilliant form of reverse psychology? I can't tell.

Yep, here's hoping that one of the devs actually reads the forums and takes good suggestions like this to heart.

Pretty much this. Used to play every day and only this, but after time and again of lack of listening to the community and poor balance decisions in a lot of cases, I just find my time better spent in other games. Nothing drawing me in and keeping me here except the friends I have made, and they are happy to play other…

That's one of the big downsides, the lack of what feels like good communication and the listening to feedback from the devs. Hopefully something that will change as time goes on, can't give up hope!

Kills needs to include mori and disconnects - or key/hatch escapes need to not count for survivor adepts. Equal footing for both!

Changing the achievement is difficult - they made it merciless, but they've changed what makes a game merciless over the years. They just need to separate pip/emblems from it, and base Merciless/Reckless/Brutal/Displeased off of the number of kills. Problem solved!

Which is just sad to say that sort of action is required because of a poorly built system.

That's not what I'm saying (even though the pip/emblem system needs a full overhaul on both sides). I'm saying separate merciless/reckless/brutal/displeased from the pip/emblem system completely. Make those strictly tied to number of kills (including DCs). That fixes everything.

"Easier" adepts? It might as well not even be an achievement with how easy it is. All I am asking for is a non-moving goalpost for killers, and the simplest solution would be to make 4K= Merciless, 3K = Reckless, 2K = Brutal, 1K = Displeased. Easy, no mess, no having to change achievement wording.

Exactly. This would be the simplest change for Behavior to make - tie Merciless/Reckless/Brutal/Entity Displeased to 4/3/2/1 kills instead of emblems, and this would solve all the problems, and not require any achievement change, eliminating Sony as a problem.

By that logic, survivors should only get adept if they escape without hatch/key? No, just leave it simply at 4 dead survivors, by any means. Including DCs to prevent abuse.

Except it isn't what survivors have to do. You can literally play like garbage, hide the entire game, use a key, and still get adept by simply escaping. You could have the worst score. Hell, you could have NO score if your entire team DC'd for you and you jumped in hatch without ever seeing killer. The difficulty is ZERO.…

This is actually a brilliant solution. Untether "Merciless Victory" from the emblem system, and simply make it Merciless Victory if you get a 4K, Ruthless for 3K, and whatever for 2K/1K. That makes it a far easier change from Behavior's side, they don't even need to change the achievement, and it makes it work at all ranks.

All I gathered from this post is that you have never played killer for any extended period of time at red ranks. I don't face camp or hard tunnel, and I play both sides at red ranks. Survivors have it easy compared to killer. Hands down.

I guess that is true, it has just been very poor emblem changes. It used to be that 4K = merciless (always merciless). They should simply say to Playstation that it is no longer possible to get merciless with a simple 4K, and they need to change the achievement to reflect that. Seems like a simple thing to do.

LOL. You will not get banned for using Enduring when it is bugged because of a problem with the perk on Behavior's side. By that logic, every single person using DS who is unhooking and not disabling their DS because it is bugged can be banned too. That isn't how it works.

Then they need to tell Playstation it is impossible, or make it impossible, so they can simply change it. This is a common sense change that should happen (and honestly never should have been changed from 4K to begin with).

Exactly - survivors would almost never get adept if they needed to get 4 Iridescent emblems like killers need to (and even with 4 Iridescent, it doesn't always say merciless, which boggles me). Survivors get it from any escape - even a key escape. So any bleed out, any DC, any mori should count as a death. I got adept on…

That's a Sony and Playstation issue. They changed it for Steam before, they can change it for Steam again.

They changed the achievements before (it was a simple 4K back in the day). They can do it again. Changing the emblem system will take weeks or months to implement correctly.

"Give it some time" - we did, on PTB. They were told he was poorly implemented. They delayed a week so we were hopeful, only to have them nerf his addons, add a cooldown/stun to his activated ability, and made Main Event essentially a harmful thing to use. As a killer with over 1300 hours who also plays survivor, I can…

While I don't disagree with this, it doesn't change the fact that they changed it from 4K to merciless because of mori. Then they changed the pip system so getting a merciless was very difficult (and more difficult the higher your rank). Now if you want to adept, you often have to derank just so the pip system is forgiving…

Same here, there is ZERO reason for it to be merciless any longer, and we know for a fact that they can change it from merciless to 4K (because they changed it from 4K to merciless). C'mon Behavior, you guys can make this change easy! @Peanits any chance we can get some visibility on this?

For me, teabagging (typically) is done to taunt/jeer at the killer in a way that can't be done with any other mechanic during the game. While I don't personally get worked up about it, I find the behavior itself to just be rude, and so as killer, I make a point to show those who teabag who can really be in control (I…

It is when you're 19th, and Euro Truck Simulator is 18th.

The problem with your "math" is you are assuming it is that simple. You are making massive assumptions as to how the programming actually occurs, when you really have zero insight into the actual code being used. You're blowing smoke with a pure hypothetical, and it just looks stupid to anyone with any actual programming…

Yes, because the devs always program things perfectly. snort If it is truly a bug, they can find a way to fix it. Hopefully without breaking "normal" use of the power, but I won't hold my breath on that.

You don't have to have an agreement. No expectation of privacy, public area (the internet is not your backyard), you are fair game. Don't like it? Stay offline, stick to single player. That would be the equivalent of shutting your front door and drawing your curtains. No one has the right to film you on private property or…

It may come to that someday. It isn't there now, and even if it is there someday, you are online in a public venue. The same laws will apply to expectation of privacy and public filming. Meaning nothing will change, if you don't like it, go play single player games offline.

Welcome the lawyer stupid enough to try, they'd have to be pretty stupid to think they could win a case like that.

LOL. You literally can do this. If you are in a public space (in the United States), you are 1000% fair game to any and all photography and video as long as it isn't illegal in some other way (voyeurism, expectation of privacy, etc). No legislation will change this, as there is long established case law that won't be…

I just watched the video on Jflicks....it isn't macro based. It is simply a skill based on game mechanics. I had never even heard of them before seeing this post, but found that I actually do them regularly just because I am experienced on Blight, just with regular old mouse movement (though I do have lower DPI so I flick…

Sorry, do you have proof that macros are being used in a widespread fashion? I play both, and I make turns that surprise people all the time. Granted, I'm swiping my mouse like an angry-about-to-quit-employee clearing their desktop, but it is legit. So unless you have documented proof, you probably shouldn't accuse people.

Many killers in this game are either based on real killers that existed, or have significant similarities to real-life scenarios. Those who have experienced those things first hand will have greater fear of them. But saying that you're afraid this exact killer may exist in reality - that's just absurd. If you are that…

You're classifying these incorrectly. Information perks related to gens, versus regression/progression related perks. Resilience, Fast Track, Prove Thyself, Technician, Repressed Alliance = progression related perks (Technician is a stretch, but prevents regression if skill check missed) Hex: Ruin, Pop Goes the Weasel,…

Samination cleared this up ages ago. Myers always breaks Ghostface out with some epic staring. Duh.

I totally read that in her voice 😂

Except you are. You said you won't play killers who can't negate looping. So for you, S tier is Doc and Clown for anti-loop alone, and everything else is D tier. I happen to disagree with you, and based purely on raw power, I listed all the killers (because I actually still play all of them). I negate looping by being…

Huntress is only scary thanks to Samination....husky girl wants to "marry" poor Tapp *shudders*

As a largely killer player (though I have played survivor up to rank 1, and play a few times a week), who plays ALL killers in rotation (despite having killers I prefer), I would count Clown and Doc among the weaker. My tier order of power would be as follows: S tier - Spirit, Blight, Ghostface, Freddy A tier - Nurse,…

Spoken like someone who only plays survivor and not both sides, thinks that only the other side is ever favored (as someone who plays both, the bias is actually about 60/40 in favor of survivor). And someone who clearly doesn't understand how to counter ranged killers in this game. It is literally the same strategy as with…

As someone who has played both survivor and killer (more killer) at rank 1, I find NOED to be a huge crutch. NOED teaches killers that they can not learn to pressure generators better, and just play relaxed and if gens (are completed, regardless of speed), they are rewarded for it. I've suggested a re-vamp of the Hex…

While you might find an opinion _offensive_, that doesn't make it wrong. It's simply something you don't like. But an opinion can't be wrong, inherently by nature, no matter how much you dislike it or find it offensive. When it does become something wrong that you can be punished for, then you've lost your freedom of…

See, again, you seek to place me on a side. I have said I'm not making an opinion on EITHER side. Then you follow up that attempt to place me on the "evil" side with an emotional statement of "sickens me to the core", in a clear attempt to garner support. I never said either side was "neither right or wrong" - I said that…

See, the problem here is you are reading into it what you WANT to read into it. You aren't being objective, you're being emotional, and giving an emotional response rather than a rational one. As I said before, I'm not arguing in favor of (or against) what that person said. You are trying to put me in that position,…

Textbook? There's a true, legal definition that was clearly followed by these three posts from some random internet troll? Wasn't aware I was in the presence of an internet lawyer. My mistake. See, when I think critically, I seek the base truth. So let's go to the legal definition, shall we? Or I suppose, as legal as we…